Are late-model film SLRs better than older ones, and will they work with my Nikon gear?
Asked 3/11/2015
3 views
2 answers
0
I shoot Nikon digitally and am curious about trying 35mm film, including possibly developing my own film in a darkroom. I’m wondering whether a late-model film SLR from the 1990s/2000s is a better choice than an older vintage body.
Specifically:
- Are there any recently made film SLRs worth seeking out, or is a good used body the practical option?
- If I already own Nikon lenses, is it best to stay with Nikon for compatibility?
- How usable are autofocus and in-camera metering on later film SLRs compared with older models?
- Will modern external flashes work with late film-era bodies?
I’m mainly interested in a camera that gives a rewarding film experience without making the process unnecessarily difficult.
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
11y ago
2 Answers
5
Disclaimer: I can't answer for Nikon, or any system other than Canon. But I can attempt to answer some of your questions in general, as relates to Canon film cameras. This will also serve to answer the same question someone else may have, but from a Canon point of view.
Canon hasn't released a new film SLR since the EOS 30V and EOS 300X in 2004. The last professional model was the EOS 1V in 2000.
- The clue is in the name EOS - all EOS cameras support autofocus with all Canon EF lenses.
- The later cameras support Canon's ETTL flash system, and in the case of the 300X at least, it supports the latest ETTL-II flash system (which improves on the original ETTL system by incorporating focus distance information).
- The metering and autofocus systems have naturally evolved over time. But considering the EOS 1V has 45 autofocus points and can use f/8 lenses, I think it's quite good for the time. There are also other features that didn't make it into digital cameras, like eye-control focus on the EOS 3. Even the lowly 300X has 7 autofocus points.
As I mentioned, Canon hasn't released a new film SLR in a decade. You could still pick one up from ebay or similar. If you want to start small, light, and cheap, you can pick up for example a 3000V for a week's worth of Starbucks. A 1V is considerably more expensive; it's also built like a tank as it was the professional workhorse of its time.
In my personal experience, I have a 300X I bought new in 2005, and which I've successfully used for years. It works with all the latest Canon lenses that I own, it even works with the off-camera flash system I bought. The autofocus is sufficiently accurate, if not blisteringly quick. I use Ilford XP2 film that can be developed using the same chemical process as colour film, but there are several options for the home darkroom. I wouldn't use it for action photography, but it works well for studio and street photography.
As relates to Nikon, I believe you can still get an F6 - arguably Nikon's best film SLR - quite easily.
Other big competitors in the latter years of film SLRs were Pentax and Minolta. You can easily pick up a system for not much cash. Each has lenses that work on modern digital cameras (in the case of Minolta, the Sony SLT range).
Originally by user25957. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user25957
11y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
A late-film-era used SLR is usually the best choice over an older vintage body if you want convenience and compatibility. By the 1990s/2000s, autofocus, metering, and flash systems had become very mature, so you do not need to assume manual focus or an external light meter.
If you already own Nikon lenses, staying with Nikon makes the most sense. A later Nikon autofocus film body is the practical route, since compatibility with your existing gear is the big advantage. One important caveat: 35mm film bodies are full-frame, so Nikon DX lenses won’t cover the full frame properly.
In general, later film SLRs can offer autofocus with compatible lenses, built-in metering, and support for more modern flash systems. Older mechanical bodies can be rewarding too, but they often mean more manual operation and fewer conveniences.
So if your goal is to explore film and darkroom work without adding unnecessary friction, start with a used late-model Nikon film SLR rather than chasing a “new” film SLR. Bodies from the later autofocus era are capable, easy to use, and a good bridge from digital to film.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI11y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Why would a 35mm color negative have a blue-green mask instead of the usual orange?
Do color negatives need to be re-stabilized after cleaning mold with isopropyl alcohol?
Which used Nikon body is the best second camera alongside a D40: D80, D100, or D1X?
Can I use older Minolta SLR lenses on a Sony A230, and what changes on APS-C?
How do the Nikon F-301, F50, F55 and Canon A-1, T80 compare today?