Is the purple fringing in this Nikkor 105mm f/2.8 shot chromatic aberration?
Asked 11/6/2016
2 views
2 answers
0
While testing a Nikkor 105mm f/2.8G, I noticed strong purple fringing in a photo taken at f/3.5 with slightly missed focus. The effect appears near the center of the frame, not just at the edges, and a similar shot at f/8 with correct focus does not show it. There was no UV/NC filter fitted, and the lens hood was used.
Because the fringing is central and seems worse when focus is a little off and the aperture is wider, I’m wondering whether this is ordinary chromatic aberration or a different phenomenon that only looks similar.
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
9y ago
2 Answers
4
Prevailing opinion seems to be that purple fringing is caused primarily by axial chromatic aberration.
Chromatic aberration comes in two forms: lateral and axial.
Lateral chromatic aberration is what we're accustomed to seeing (and fixing) as the usual blue/red fringes, especially toward the edge of a picture. Longer and shorter wavelengths are refracted enough differently that (especially toward the edge of the frame) we see red and/or blue fringes, especially at high-contrast transitions. Main thing to keep in mind is that the basic cause is the light being bent sideways by different amounts, depending on its wavelength.
Axial (or longitudinal) chromatic aberration is also frequently visible (especially in larger aperture, fixed-focus lenses). The most common form is seen where a high-contrast transition goes out of focus. For example1:
This happens because the lens is basically forming images at different distances from the lens to the image plane, depending on the wavelength of the light. This same general phenomenon is also generally believed to cause purple fringing.
The big difference with purple fringing is (or at least seems to be) that the fringe is typically caused at least in large part by deep violet to ultraviolet light. The reason it comes out purple is that the dyes typically used for both red and green color filters are fairly transparent to ultraviolet light. So, even though the light itself is deep blue to ultraviolet, it shows up as a mixture of blue and red, because the red filter also admits that light.
That also explains why purple fringing can tend to be somewhat elusive when people try to test for it. In a studio test, you'll normally have too little ultraviolet (or even deep blue) light to trigger it to start with. Even if you're outdoors, the amount of ultraviolet in the light varies--and our eyes aren't sensitive in that part of the spectrum, so we can't see how much (or little) is present. Unlike eyes (or film), however, camera sensors are actually fairly sensitive in this part of the spectrum.
The most obvious way of preventing it is a strong ultraviolet filter (UV, skylight, etc.) Note, however, that the degree to which these filters really cut ultraviolet varies quite widely, so don't be terribly surprised if some make little or not difference.
1. This wasn't taken with the Nikkor in question but like the Nikkor, this lens is quite low in lateral chromatic aberration. OTOH, the picture is pretty much a worst-case for displaying axial chromatic aberration, and I've increased the saturation to make it even more visible. Also note that this is a 100% crop from essentially dead-center in the photo, where lateral chromatic aberration would almost never be visible anyway.
Originally by user603. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user603
9y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
Yes — this is most likely chromatic aberration, specifically axial (longitudinal) chromatic aberration, often seen as purple fringing.
There are two main types:
- lateral CA: usually appears more toward the frame edges as colored side-to-side fringes
- axial/longitudinal CA: can appear even near the center, especially with fast apertures and slight front/back focus
Your example fits axial CA because:
- it is stronger at f/3.5 than at f/8
- it shows up when focus is slightly off
- it appears around high-contrast edges
- it can occur in the middle of the image, not just the edges
Stopping down reduces it because a narrower aperture cuts the rays that focus at slightly different distances for different wavelengths. So the fact that the f/8 image looks clean strongly supports axial CA rather than something unrelated.
In short: it is real chromatic aberration, just not the more familiar lateral edge fringing.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI9y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Is strong color fringing at f/1.8 normal on the Pentax DA 50mm f/1.8?
How do I manually correct chromatic aberration in Lightroom 4 if the old sliders are gone?
Why does my Nikon 50mm f/1.4D show purple fringing in out-of-focus areas?
How does chromatic aberration affect black-and-white images?
Why won’t Lightroom remove the purple fringe in my photo?
