Is 4.85V at 70mA safe on the Canon 5D Mark III PC sync port?
Asked 10/23/2017
7 views
2 answers
0
I want to trigger a vintage Graflite flashbulb unit from a Canon 5D Mark III. Older advice usually focuses on trigger voltage, but flashbulb systems can also demand relatively high trigger current.
Canon publishes trigger-voltage guidance, but I have not found a published maximum trigger current specification for the 5D Mark III PC sync port. My current interface circuit presents about 4.85V and 70mA to the camera-side trigger connection.
Is that likely to be safe for the 5D Mark III PC sync port, or should I isolate the camera from the flash current entirely? If relevant, would the hot shoe be a better trigger point than the PC port for this kind of load?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
8y ago
2 Answers
2
The Canon engineers are probably correct in saying that the PC port is a low-voltage port. I would not recommend putting much current at all through that port.
There are a couple of ways of solving your problem:
Add a single transistor on the input to your flash. Then, your flash trigger power will become negligible, because the transistor will be triggered through the camera, and all the high-current flow will be within the device itself.
Use the hotshoe. The center pin of the hotshoe can be used to trigger most flashes. I can't say with certainty what Canon uses for the hotshoe mount in the 5D Mark III, either, but according to a discussion thread on Electronics point, the XT uses a 2SK2715 MOSFET for the flash trigger, and it's probably a good bet that they use the same part on all their cameras. The 2SK2715 is made by ROHM Semiconductor, and according to the spec sheet, it is rated at 500V at up to 2A. Canon downrated their maximum spec to 250V, either as a hedge against slightly substandard parts or to allow them to source other equivalent parts that may have looser tolerances. And, of course, a part designed to handle up to 1 kilowatt triggering power laughs at your 0.3395 Watt triggering current requirements, and any even-semi-plausible replacement MOSFET that handles such high voltages will have similar specs.
If you're worried about it, use one of those approaches.
Originally by user25054. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user25054
8y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
No reliable Canon current limit is given in the answers, so 70mA should not be assumed safe.
The community responses suggest the PC sync port is intended as a low-voltage/low-current trigger, and one answer measured behavior consistent with a device such as a thyristor/triac that may only need a few mA and may not behave well with heavier loads. Another answer says the hot shoe sync appears more robust than the PC port, but that still does not prove 70mA is safe.
The safest recommendation is to isolate the camera from the flashbulb trigger current entirely. Use a transistor/MOSFET or other isolated trigger interface so the camera only switches a negligible current, while the flashbulb circuit current is supplied within your external trigger device. That is the approach specifically recommended in the answers.
So: do not rely on 4.85V/70mA being acceptable at the 5D Mark III PC socket. Reduce the camera-side trigger current to a very small value with an interface circuit, or use a properly isolated trigger solution.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI8y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
What trigger voltage and current are safe for a Sony A7R/A7R II hot shoe or PC-sync flash connection?
Can any camera and flash with PC sync be connected across brands?
Can a radio flash trigger work from a Pentax hot shoe without a sync cable?
Is it safe to use two flashes with very different trigger voltages on one camera?
Can a Canon EOS 5D Mark II hot shoe trigger my own device when the shutter fires?