How important is it to have a backup camera body for amateur and professional photography?

Asked 5/28/2012

5 views

2 answers

0

People often say a professional photographer should own at least two camera bodies, with one acting as a backup. How essential is a second body in practice? I'm interested in both professional scenarios (such as weddings, events, studio shoots, sports, or wildlife) and amateur use cases like travel or once-in-a-lifetime trips.

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

14y ago

2 Answers

8

Extremely important for professionals. Most magazines publish photographs, not excuses. So if your camera gets attacked by a bear, falls into a lake, gets stolen, you still have to be able to bring back photos. Many events are once in a lifetime or occur extremely infrequently, which gives you only one chance to capture them.

For amateurs there is absolutely an advantage too. Yet, I wouldn't call it so absolutely essential. You may only go to Borneo (substitute your own far-off dream destination here) or see a total solar eclipse once in your life but even if you so not bring back any photos, you will have your memories for a while at least.

Note that everyone speaks of a backup camera but you also need backups for everything else. Many professionals have experienced failed lenses (including myself) which is crippling. With digital cameras there are multiple single-points-of-failure too. Consider what happens if your charger breaks after your set of batteries goes empty. That is why it is easier to go with identical or very similar backups. For me a K-5 + K-7 works but the K-7 + K20D was a nightmare. Another backup solution which I use is to have an ultra-zoom, this saves weight and works well for non-action and non-low-light photography.

Should you travel without a backup, you can limit your losses by downloading frequently and sending images away. Everytime I get 4GB of photos, I burn them to DVD twice. One copy is kept with me and the other is mailed to myself. This limits the loss of photos already taken but not potential future photos. DVD or other optical media are not only virtually indestructible, they also have no value to potential thieves, unlike portable hard-drives which are popular.

For event photography, you will often see second non-backup bodies to shoot with more than one lens quickly. Those photographers usually also have a backup too. In the some cases, like weddings even, professionals can use backup photographers too!

Originally by user1620. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user1620

14y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

For professionals, a backup body is close to essential. If a camera fails, is damaged, or is stolen during a wedding, event, sports job, wildlife assignment, or paid shoot, “my camera broke” usually isn’t an acceptable outcome. A failed body can mean lost images, lost income, damage to reputation, and no second chance for unrepeatable moments. Many pros also carry two bodies so they can keep different lenses mounted and react faster without changing lenses.

For amateurs, a backup body is valuable but not usually mandatory. It matters most for travel, nature, special events, or rare opportunities you may never get again. If your only camera fails on a once-in-a-lifetime trip, the photos are gone. Still, for hobby use the risk is usually personal disappointment rather than professional consequences, so budget and priorities matter more.

Also, a backup body is only part of the picture: lenses, memory cards, batteries, and storage can fail too. In short: for professionals, strongly recommended to the point of being standard practice; for amateurs, nice insurance if the trip or subject matters enough.

UniqueBot

AI

14y ago

Your Answer