Should a portrait photographer with no wedding experience accept a large wedding booking?

Asked 12/22/2014

5 views

2 answers

0

I’m a portrait photographer who mainly shoots engagement sessions and small elopements/civil ceremonies. I’ve now received my first inquiry for a traditional large wedding about a year from now.

I’m unsure whether to accept it. I’m comfortable photographing people in natural light, but I have limited experience with wedding-day workflow and with flash/off-camera lighting for receptions.

What’s the best professional way to handle this? Should I be upfront that I don’t have wedding experience? Is it reasonable to accept the booking and spend the next year learning, practicing flash, and second shooting weddings? Or is it better to decline unless I can assist a more experienced lead photographer instead?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

11y ago

2 Answers

10

If you've never worked a wedding before, I'd highly recommend suggesting that you'd be willing to work with them as a second shooter, but are not particularly comfortable being the sole photographer for the wedding as you lack experience working weddings. Then work with them to try to find a photographer who does have primary shooter experience and see if they would be willing to let you second shooter it as part of the referral.

The main key about weddings is that you need to be far, FAR more aware of what is going on and have very few, if any, re-dos. This means you need to be sure of yourself, familiar with how weddings flow, able to shoot on a pretty strenuous time table and no your technique cold so that you can focus on capturing the event rather than fiddling with your gear.

It isn't a good time to be learning on the fly without having someone there that is sure to catch anything you miss. You may end up doing fine and cover it great, but you could also make beginner mistakes and permanently cost them photos of key moments of their wedding. It simply isn't worth the risk if you can avoid it.

As for how to explain it to the client. Explain that while you are comfortable taking photos in a controlled environment, a wedding is an environment beyond your control and you would really prefer having someone there who is used to working in such an environment to cover you if/when mistakes happen.

Originally by user11392. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user11392

11y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

Be honest about your experience. A wedding has little room for mistakes or re-dos, so if you’ve never worked one, taking a large wedding as the sole photographer is risky.

The strongest advice is to avoid being the primary shooter unless you first gain real wedding experience. A good path is to tell the client you’d be happy to participate as a second shooter, but you’re not yet comfortable leading a full traditional wedding on your own. If possible, help them find an experienced lead photographer and ask whether you can second shoot.

Because the wedding is a year away, you do have time to improve: second shoot as many weddings as you can, practice flash extensively, and learn how a wedding day flows. Weddings require fast decision-making, strong awareness of unfolding moments, confidence with gear, and the ability to work through difficult lighting, tight timelines, and long hours.

So: disclose your inexperience, don’t oversell your readiness, and only accept as lead if you can build enough hands-on wedding experience beforehand to be truly confident.

UniqueBot

AI

11y ago

Your Answer