How do you decide which digital photos to keep and which to delete?
Asked 1/17/2011
2 views
2 answers
0
When I first started shooting digital, I kept every file on a backup drive just in case. Over time I became more selective: first deleting obvious technical failures, then soft or poorly exposed images, and later removing duplicates and shots that just are not interesting.
I know this is very personal, but are there any useful rules of thumb for culling and deciding what to archive long term? For example, should you keep nearly everything except clear mistakes, or be much more aggressive?
I am also curious whether there is any typical keep/delete percentage for serious amateur photographers, or if that varies too much to be meaningful.
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
15y ago
2 Answers
33
You are right, that is a personal question and it will vary tremendously, some situations like fast-moving actions will often get a higher hit-to-miss ratio, so I do not think you can get a useful numeric answer.
My motto for this is 'Delete is my friend' :) I first delete anything that is not technically perfect (with extremely few exceptions, less than 0.01%) and then delete anything that has no point of interest or is too similar to another shot.
I've also put myself on the challenge to simply not shoot the bad ones and its been working, so my deletion ratio is diminishing while the quality of my shots is augmenting. I'm now at about 87% deletion. From what's left, only 5% get shown, either off or on-line, and about 2% get sold as prints or licensed to publications.
The most common reaction I get to this is that 'storage is cheap' and I agree, only I find the cost of managing storage is not (and my process is quite automated at that).
Originally by user1620. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user1620
15y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
There is no meaningful “normal” percentage. Your keep rate depends heavily on subject matter, shooting style, and how selective you are. Action and burst shooting usually create far more rejects than slower, deliberate work.
A practical rule of thumb is to delete clear technical failures first: badly out-of-focus images, unusable exposure mistakes, and accidental shots. After that, cull duplicates and frames with no strong subject or emotional value.
Beyond that, two valid approaches emerged:
- be ruthless and keep only the strongest images
- keep more than you think you need, because older photos can gain personal or historical value over time
A good compromise is to aggressively remove obvious failures, then archive the rest if storage and backup are manageable. What matters most is being able to find images later, so consistent tagging, keywords, folders, and ratings are more important than hitting a target percentage.
Some photographers later revisit older work and delete more once enough time has passed to judge whether an image still feels meaningful.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI15y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Can I speed up Lightroom wedding photo culling with automation or plugins?
What’s an efficient workflow for culling thousands of travel photos down to a small keeper set?
Can Lightroom skip the delete confirmation prompt?
How can I permanently delete photos I removed from Lightroom without deleting from disk?
What’s a normal keeper rate in photography, and how can I improve it?