How do labs expose scans of intentionally overexposed foggy negatives?
Asked 1/19/2022
2 views
2 answers
0
I photographed a very bright foggy scene on color negative film and intentionally gave extra exposure so the fog would stay bright instead of being rendered as middle gray. After lab scanning, the files came back darker and muddier than I expected.
When a lab scans negatives, does the scanner or software effectively normalize each frame toward a middle tone, similar to how a camera meter would? Or are scans usually done with fixed settings for a film stock so that bright scenes stay bright and dark scenes stay dark?
The lab told me each image is judged individually during scanning, but that seems subjective unless the operator knows the intended look. I was aiming for a bright, airy rendering.
Is this likely a scanning issue rather than exposure on the negative? And what is the best way to correct a foggy negative scan that looks too dark or muddy?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
4y ago
2 Answers
2
Does anyone know how I could fix this picture?
Increase gamma/exposure by a half stop (or however much you like).
Auto levels on a separate layer with color blending to correct the color cast. Some programs use temperature and tint to adjust white balance.
Any other levels/curves adjustments to taste. Some programs have shadows, midtones, highlights adjustments, which are just another way to work with curves.
... a human judges the brightness of each picture individually while scanning.
That's doubtful. More likely, a computer auto adjusts the images. Then a human quickly checks thumbnails for obvious errors. The image you have would be left alone because it looks like what it is, a foggy day.
To minimize operator effort, each image is probably auto adjusted independently of others. The same setting for an entire roll wouldn't work well because people don't expose every frame perfectly. You can ask the lab if they're willing to show you their scanning process. (I didn't pay close enough attention to this detail when my local lab showed me their process.)
Now the images I got back from the lab are much darker than I wanted them...
It's darker because the computer/operator can't read your mind. If you have special instructions for the lab, you need to provide them ahead of time. You might also need to pay for editing services.
The basic scans that labs provide are just a starting point for you to do your own editing. You can screen the lab scans for images to digitize and process yourself. If you have a reasonably good digital camera, you can use a slide copier.
Originally by user75526. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user75526
4y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
Lab scans often are not final interpretations. In many workflows, each frame is auto-adjusted by scanner software, with only a quick human check unless you paid for custom work. That means a bright fog scene can easily be “normalized” into something darker and flatter than you intended.
So yes: the scan can be the issue even if the negative exposure was fine. A scan is usually best treated as a starting point, not a finished print.
To fix the file, brighten it in post: raise exposure or gamma by about half a stop or to taste, then use levels/curves. You can also correct any color cast with auto levels on a separate color blend layer or with white balance/temperature-tint controls. After that, adjust shadows/midtones/highlights as needed. For a softer, airier fog look, reducing clarity/texture/dehaze can help.
If you want scans to match your artistic intent consistently, the practical options are: scan the negatives yourself, pay for custom scanning, or edit the lab scans afterward.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI4y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Why do my home-developed C-41 negatives scan with low contrast and saturation?
Why are my self-developed 35mm negatives scanning dark, grainy, and noisy?
How can I get more accurate, consistent color when scanning Portra 400 negatives?
Should you use negative exposure compensation on an overcast day to preserve the cloudy mood?
Can old film negatives lose sharpness over time, or is blur usually a scanning issue?
