How do I choose the right tripod plate length for a large telephoto lens?
Asked 5/11/2016
3 views
2 answers
0
I’m choosing an Arca-style tripod plate for a Nikon 400mm f/3.5 and see several lengths available, from shorter universal plates to longer dedicated plates. For a heavy telephoto with a tripod collar, is there an ideal plate length? I’m wondering whether a longer plate helps with front-heavy balance, or whether the plate should simply match the lens foot. Are there downsides to using a plate that is too long, such as flex, screw stress, or interference with handling/focusing?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
10y ago
2 Answers
3
Trust the designers of the lens and get a plate that matches the foot they chose to include with the lens' tripod collar. A plate should ideally be just long enough that the entire foot can rest upon the plate without any more additional overhang than is necessary. You always want to center the weight of the lens on the tripod at a point underneath the foot, not in front of or behind it.
The purpose of a longer plate is not to allow mounting the lens further forward or back than the limits of the foot on the lens' tripod collar. The purpose of a longer plate is to match up with a lens that has a longer foot and make it easier to mount/dismount the lens from the tripod or other support. Most heavy lenses have feet that are longer than the receivers on most QD tripod heads. There is room for adjustment for extenders, varying camera body weights, etc. within the range of the length of the lens' tripod collar foot. If you can't balance the camera and lens over the limits of the length of the tripod collar foot you may have too much weight hanging on the lens.
If the plate is longer than the tripod collar foot it doesn't matter on which end (or both) it sticks out. Put it where it won't get in the way of operating the lens. But any part of the plate that extends beyond the end of the tripod collar foot should not be centered over the load bearing part of the tripod head to which the plate is attached. The purpose of a plate is to make attaching/detaching quick and painless, not allow mounting too far forward or back.
The advantage of two screws is primarily with regard to preventing rotation of the lens foot on the plate. If a foot or plate only has a single screw, then an anti-rotation feature is also needed.
Here's the current version of the Nikon 400mm f/2.8 mounted on a gimbal head. The lens' tripod collar foot is place in the correct spot to balance the lens and a camera body somewhere between the front and back of the foot as seen here. Notice that the end of the foot towards the camera is lined up with the back edge of the gimbal mount, even though the QR plate extends a tad past both the front and rear of the lens' foot. If the combination is still front-heavy, you can adjust the QR plate rearward in the receiver on the head until the end of the lens' foot towards the front of the lens is above the front edge of the gimbal head's receiver.
If your 400mm f/3.5 won't balance properly with the foot over the head, then your best option something like this. Note that the tripod foot is still over the gimbal head's receiver as designed. Also notice that the bracket connecting the foot and the additional support on the front of the lens is made of "u-shaped" stock which makes it considerably stiffer than the QR Plate, which is still beneath the tripod foot and above the gimbal head's receiver. None of the part of the QR plate that extends behind the back of the lens' foot is load bearing.
Originally by user15871. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user15871
10y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
For a big telephoto with a tripod collar, the plate should generally match the lens foot, not be used to move the lens far forward or backward for balance.
A good rule is to use a plate long enough that the tripod foot is fully supported, with little or no unnecessary overhang. The load should stay centered under the foot chosen by the lens designers. In other words, don’t try to “rebalance” a front-heavy lens by hanging the clamp far out toward one end of the plate.
Longer plates are mainly useful when the lens has a longer foot, when two mounting screws are supported by the foot, or when extra length makes mounting/dismounting easier on heads with shorter clamps. They are not primarily for changing the balance point beyond the limits of the foot itself.
If a plate is excessively long, the practical downsides are mostly convenience-related: extra bulk, possible interference with handling, and snagging. The key is secure attachment and full support under the foot.
So for your lens, choose a plate that fits the foot properly and allows secure clamping, rather than simply choosing the longest plate available.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI10y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Are Manfrotto Q6 quick-release plates compatible with Acratech and other Arca-Swiss clamps?
Is it safe to mount a telephoto lens on a tripod using only the camera body?
Can you attach a neck strap to a Nikon 80-400mm lens?
Where can I find an Arca-Swiss compatible quick-release lever clamp?
What tripod head works best for large telephoto or supertelephoto lenses?

