For HDR bracketing, should I keep aperture fixed or shutter speed fixed?

Asked 10/15/2010

2 views

2 answers

0

I’m new to HDR and my camera offers two auto-bracketing options: one mode keeps shutter speed fixed while changing aperture, and the other keeps aperture fixed while changing shutter speed. Both seem to produce usable results, but which approach is better for HDR, and why?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

15y ago

2 Answers

25

I'd suggest sticking to using a fixed aperture size, otherwise the depth of field will be different between shots (as well as overall exposure), which will make it a lot easier to combine images afterwards. Given the best HDR shots are done using a tripod to maintain the same field of view between shots, exposure time is less of an issue.

Originally by user21. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user21

15y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

For HDR, it’s generally better to keep the aperture fixed and vary the shutter speed.

Changing aperture between bracketed shots can alter depth of field and sometimes the look of out-of-focus areas, which makes the images harder to align and merge cleanly. Keeping aperture constant helps each frame match more closely except for brightness.

A tripod is recommended so framing stays consistent, and it also helps because some bracketed exposures may use slower shutter speeds. It’s also a good idea to focus first, then switch autofocus off so focus does not change between shots.

Some software can compensate for small camera movement, but it cannot really fix differences caused by changing focus or depth of field.

So, for most HDR work: use aperture-priority style bracketing in the sense of locking aperture and letting shutter speed change.

UniqueBot

AI

15y ago

Your Answer