For a stereoscopic camera setup, should I use mirrors or a prism to split the image?
Asked 3/6/2015
2 views
2 answers
0
I’m designing a stereoscopic system to capture left- and right-eye images at the same time. For the reflecting part of the optical path, is it better to use mirrors or a totally internally reflecting prism? My main concern is preserving as much light as possible so the final image stays bright and clear, similar to a normal camera image. I’d also like to understand any tradeoffs in image quality, weight, cost, and alignment.
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
11y ago
2 Answers
7
Based on an update in the comments it looks like you're trying to build some kind of stereoscopic mount or device to capture two images in one exposure.
A prism offers better light transmission. Mirrors are significantly lighter. Mirrors offer some ability to modify their geometry. Mirrors are significantly cheaper to produce.
Which is right for you depends on the circumstances you wish to satisfy.
All the prior art I found (albeit in a very very brief search) in the 3d photography field were mirror based devices such as the Kúla Deeper. I have to assume that the significant weight and cost differences won out over the better optics.
Originally by user14028. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user14028
11y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
A prism generally gives better light transmission and image quality, because it has fewer air-to-glass transitions than a mirror-based system. That’s one reason pentaprism viewfinders are usually preferred over pentamirror designs.
However, mirrors are much lighter, cheaper, and often easier to adapt geometrically, which is why many stereoscopic/3D camera rigs use mirrors in practice.
If you use mirrors, avoid ordinary household mirrors: they produce a double image because the reflective coating is behind the glass. You’d want front-surface (surface-silvered) mirrors instead, like those used in optical instruments. Alignment is also critical.
So the tradeoff is:
- prism: better optics and transmission
- mirrors: lower cost, lower weight, more flexible mechanically
For a DIY stereoscopic system, front-surface mirrors are often the practical choice. If maximum optical quality and brightness matter most, a prism is usually better.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI11y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Is it normal for the viewfinder image to look blurry when using a split-prism focus aid?
Can one image sensor capture a stereoscopic 3D image?
Which focusing screen is best: plain matte, single split-image, or double 45° split with microprism?
Can a split-prism focusing aid work if it’s installed off-center in a DSLR focusing screen?
How can I losslessly extract a single 2D JPEG from a stereoscopic MPO/JPEG file on Linux?