Does a pixelated LCD mask inside a lens exist to block only the brightest parts of a scene?
Asked 10/9/2021
5 views
2 answers
0
Could a camera or lens use a coronagraph-like mask, or a pixelated LCD/photochromic layer, to selectively dim only very bright parts of the incoming image before they reach the sensor? The idea is like a localized electronic ND filter that blocks highlights while leaving darker areas alone, to extend dynamic range. Does anything like this exist, and would it work in practice?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
4y ago
2 Answers
5
It doesn't work.
(Source: Wikipedia)
As you can see, the light does not follow a single path from the object to the projected image / camera sensor. Far an in-focus image, we put the object at S1 and the sensor at S2.
We can add another lens and project the image at S2 to a sensor on the other side (e.g. S4). We call the image at S2 an intermediate image.
For a coronagraph, we just add a mask at S2. That only works because the sun and the stars are in focus at the same time.
Usually, we do not have everything in focus, though. Out-of-focus areas will produce circles instead of points at S2, and different circles at S4. So, it is not possible to effectively filter out-of-focus areas at an intermediate image plane.*)
Another problem with such a filter is that the filter's structure is in focus. It will produce nice Moiré patterns when not 100% aligned with the sensor's pixels.
The only place to put this adaptive filter is in the sensor.
*) There is one exception: You can do it for a very small aperture (like a pinhole camera), because there is essentially only one path from any point of the object to the sensor. But the image will be so dark already that you won't need any more darkening. Otherwise you'd need something like holographic technology.
Originally by user59825. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user59825
4y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
Not as a practical camera/lens feature.
A coronagraph works because the unwanted bright object is masked at an image plane where the Sun and surrounding stars are simultaneously in focus. In a normal camera, light from each scene point does not travel in a single isolated path through the lens. At any intermediate plane, in-focus and especially out-of-focus parts of the scene spread out, so a pixelated mask there would not cleanly correspond to the sensor pixels.
That means it would be ineffective for selectively blocking arbitrary bright areas across a normal photographic scene, and the mask structure itself could introduce visible artifacts.
As a market product, the answers indicate this does not currently exist publicly. In practice, photographers handle scenes with too much dynamic range using HDR/bracketing, exposure blending, or flatter video profiles for grading, rather than an internal adaptive mask.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI4y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Can a filter block one handedness of circularly polarized light, and would it be useful in photography?
Can Photoshop mask just one Smart Filter on a Smart Object?
How does Lightroom handle RAW+JPEG pairs on import, and should I keep both?
What causes the rainbow grid flare around bright lights in an out-of-focus photo?
Why don’t two circular polarizing camera filters go dark when crossed at 90°?
