Do you need in-camera HDR if you already shoot RAW?
Asked 10/1/2017
4 views
2 answers
0
I’m comparing cameras where both can shoot RAW, but only one offers an in-camera HDR mode. If I shoot RAW and edit later, can I get the same benefits as HDR in post-processing? What does in-camera HDR add compared with a camera that only shoots RAW?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
8y ago
2 Answers
10
Yes and No.
Taking a single RAW, you have more dynamic range than a single JPG, so you have a limited 'high dynamic range', depending on the camera's capabilities.
For a less limited HDR, you need to do bracketing - you shoot a series of identical compositions, while changing exposure, for example -4, -2, 0, +2, +4. This allows you to compose those shots in post-processing, and thereby cover a much larger dynamic range.
Those bracket series could be JPG too; generally, using RAW is better, but it doesn't disable HDRs.
Many high-end cameras support this bracketing automatically.
Originally by user46784. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user46784
8y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
Mostly, no—you don’t need in-camera HDR just because a camera can shoot RAW. A single RAW file already holds more dynamic range than a JPEG, so you can often recover extra highlight and shadow detail in post.
But that is not the same as true HDR from multiple exposures. In-camera HDR typically automates shooting and combining a bracketed series of exposures to capture a wider tonal range than one exposure can hold. You can also do that yourself later, often with more control, using RAW files and HDR software.
So the difference is:
- single RAW: more editing latitude than JPEG, but limited to the dynamic range of one exposure
- HDR mode: combines multiple exposures to exceed the range of a single shot
In-camera HDR is mainly a convenience feature. It usually creates a finished JPEG automatically and makes the processing decisions for you. Off-camera processing from RAW generally gives you more flexibility and often better results, as long as the scene and camera are steady enough for bracketed shots.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI8y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
When should I use in-camera HDR instead of exposure bracketing?
Does Sony Image Data Converter offer any advantages over Lightroom for Sony RAW files?
Is there a modern lossy format that preserves most RAW flexibility while saving space?
Do point-and-shoot cameras support RAW, and can unsupported models be made to shoot RAW?
Does Lightroom use the full editing latitude of RAW files?