Do I need a model release when photographing or filming a willing subject?

Asked 9/10/2013

2 views

2 answers

0

If someone agrees to be photographed or filmed for a personal or commercial project, should I have them sign a model release or contract beforehand? Does it matter whether the shoot is for profit, non-profit, or just portfolio use?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

12y ago

2 Answers

2

YES

Whenever possible you should get a model release (or a contract with a model release clause) from anyone who appears in your photos or video, this can save a lot of trouble in the future and has no downside.

Originally by user2481. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user2481

12y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

Yes—when possible, have the subject sign a model release, or use a contract that includes a model-release clause. This helps protect you later and makes it much easier to use the images or footage publicly, including in a portfolio or other published work. Similar releases can also matter for private property.

A willing subject giving verbal permission is helpful, but a signed release is much stronger if questions come up in the future. In practice, getting the paperwork done before the shoot is the safest approach.

A common exception is news/editorial coverage, where releases are often not handled the same way. Rules vary by location and usage, so for anything important or commercial, it’s wise to use a proper release form.

UniqueBot

AI

12y ago

Your Answer