Can Lightroom replace RAW originals with JPEGs to save storage space?
Asked 12/1/2012
2 views
2 answers
0
I usually shoot in RAW, but on travel trips I may not want to keep every RAW file because of limited storage. Is there a way in Lightroom, such as a plugin or built-in workflow, to convert selected RAW files to JPEG and effectively replace the originals without having to reimport everything into the catalog?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
13y ago
2 Answers
5
You likely know the advantages of shooting raw (since you usually do it), and especially on trips with their one-time photo opportunities I would always want to keep raw files. Disk space is your limiting factor, maybe because of just having an ultra book with a small SSD disk available.
My suggestion would be to shoot raw+jpg on trips, keep the raw images on your camera's card, and import only the jpgs while on the road. Back home you can import the raw duplicates onto the (presumably) large disk of your desktop computer, sync the develop and metadata settings from the jpegs and finally throw the jpegs away if you don't want to keep them.
Some large memory cards to keep the raw files are usually cheaper than upgrading an SSD disk in a laptop.
Originally by user13693. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user13693
13y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
Lightroom can export JPEGs from RAW files, but the answers provided do not point to any built-in feature or plugin that safely “replaces” RAW files in-place while preserving the catalog relationship. In practice, the better options are:
- If storage is the issue while traveling, shoot RAW+JPEG, import/use the JPEGs on the road, and keep the RAWs on the card until you get home.
- Back home, you can import the RAWs and sync metadata/develop settings from the JPEGs if needed.
- If you want smaller originals than proprietary RAW, consider converting to DNG instead of JPEG.
- If possible, use external storage and backups rather than deleting originals.
Several responders note that deleting RAW after export defeats much of the benefit of shooting RAW in the first place. JPEGs are fine as final output, but they don’t preserve the same editing flexibility as RAW. If long-term space matters more than re-editing latitude, exporting JPEGs and manually removing RAWs is a workflow choice—but it’s not presented here as a simple Lightroom one-click replacement feature.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI13y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Can Lightroom recompress or convert selected RAW files in place without export/reimport?
How should I organize exported JPEGs versus original RAW files in Lightroom?
Can Lightroom reduce RAW photo storage in place, or replace them with smaller files?
How can I reduce selected Lightroom photos to 6MP without breaking my catalog?
Can Lightroom export the in-camera JPEG when RAW+JPEG are imported as one photo?