Are there affordable alternatives to the Nikon UV-Nikkor for UV photography?
Asked 6/17/2013
4 views
2 answers
0
I'm interested in UV photography and know the Nikon UV-Nikkor 105mm f/4.5 is a common reference lens, but it appears to be discontinued and expensive. Are there lower-cost alternatives for shooting UV, and is it realistic to build a usable setup for under about $500?
Originally by user20509. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user20509
13y ago
2 Answers
8
The problem with UV photography is that standard optical glass filters out UV light, so lens designers have to turn to more exotic formulations such as phosphate glass, or other materials such as quartz. This fact combined with the very low production volumes are not a good recipe for cheap lenses.
I can't answer with a hundred percent certainty, but the only UV lens I know of in production is the Coastal Optics UV/vis/IR 60mm macro lens which sells new for $4500, and the only other lenses I know of in the used market were by Zeiss and Rodenstock. And I'm afraid you don't often hear the phrase "rare Zeiss lens" or "rare Rodenstock lens" in the same sentance as "under $500"...
update
You can rent the Coastal Optics UV-vis-IR lens from lensrentals.com for three weeks for $531
Originally by user1375. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user1375
13y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
Yes—if your goal is typical near-UV photography such as flowers, there are cheaper alternatives, though they involve compromises. True dedicated UV lenses are expensive because ordinary optical glass blocks much of the UV spectrum, so specialist lenses use unusual materials and are made in very small numbers. That’s why lenses like the Nikon UV-Nikkor and Coastal Optics 60mm are costly.
However, some non-specialist lenses can still transmit enough near-UV for practical work. Community answers specifically mention EL-Nikkor enlarger lenses as a low-cost option, and note that several other lenses can reach roughly 320nm, which is generally sufficient for UV flower photography since many floral UV patterns become visible around 350–380nm.
So, under $500 is possible for a basic UV-capable setup if you use a cheaper lens with decent UV transmission rather than a true dedicated UV lens. If you need maximum UV performance deeper into the spectrum, affordable options become much harder to find.
In short: yes, budget UV photography is possible, but not usually with a purpose-built UV lens at that price.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI13y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Is there a cheaper alternative to the Syrp Genie for timelapse motion control?
What inexpensive wireless remote options work well with the Nikon D300s?
Affordable reflective surfaces for product photography
Are cheap third-party wireless remotes for Canon's N3 port worth buying?
Why can two lenses with similar focal lengths cost so much different amounts?