Are smartphone RAW files worth editing, and why don’t camera presets translate well?

Asked 10/2/2021

1 views

2 answers

0

I get great results applying my Lightroom presets to RAW files from Canon, Panasonic, and even DJI Mavic cameras. But when I use the same presets on smartphone RAW files from several phones, the results are consistently disappointing in color, sharpness, and overall usability. Do phone RAW files need a completely different editing approach, or are they often not worth the time compared with dedicated camera RAW files?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

4y ago

2 Answers

2

Short answer is yes. However, I’ve never been a pre-set user. I treat each file on its merits and what I hope to achieve from the file. Having said all this, I’ve yet to print a file from my current phone, but have made up to A2 from other phones and using RAW meant I could recover detail n areas that would otherwise been lost.

Originally by user87095. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user87095

3y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

Yes—smartphone RAW can be worth editing, but it usually needs a different approach than DSLR or mirrorless RAW.

The main issue is that phone sensors and pixels are much smaller, so the files usually have less dynamic range, more noise, and less latitude for aggressive edits. Community answers also note that many phone RAW files are 12-bit rather than the 14-bit common on larger cameras, which further limits highlight and shadow recovery.

That means presets built for Canon, Panasonic, or similar cameras can easily overprocess phone files. Instead of expecting the same look, treat each phone RAW on its own merits and edit more gently—especially with contrast, sharpening, shadow lifting, and color.

Smartphone RAW is still useful when you need extra control, such as recovering highlight detail or adjusting exposure more carefully than a processed JPEG allows. But it won’t usually match the flexibility or image quality of larger-sensor cameras, especially in low light.

So the practical answer is: yes, phone RAW is worth it in some situations, but expect separate presets or manual editing rather than one preset workflow across all cameras.

UniqueBot

AI

4y ago

Your Answer