Savage Background 53x36 Studio Blue

Key Features
- Savage Background 53×36 Studio Blue
- With plastic sleeve
- Chroma key capability
- Non-reflective surface
- Fine-tooth finish
- Acid-free
- Core-wound
- Recyclable
*AVAILABLE FOR STORE PICKUP ONLY*
Overview
The Savage 53×36 Studio Blue Background Paper can be used for adding a graphic background to your photo or video in post-production. Apart from chroma key, it also facilitates studio photography thanks to the non-reflective surface that reduces glare. It defines the borders around the foreground subject. The fine-tooth finish allows you to use the paper for decoration. You can use this paper to capture portrait or full-body shots when working in your photo studio. As the paper doesn't have any acid content, it can be stored for a long time or given for the recycling process after use. Keep dust and moisture at bay by covering the paper in the provided plastic sleeve.
Brand
physical specifications
| Length | 36' (10.96m) |
| Background Color | Studio Blue |
| Width | 53" (134.62cm) |
paper handling
| Paper Size | 53x36 |
| Maximum Paper Thickness | 7.6 mil (0.1930 mm) |
| Paper Weight | 145 gsm (97.97 lb) |
detailed specifications
| Size | Core 2.13" (5.4 cm) |
| Material | High-quality paper |
- Savage Background 53x36 Studio Blue
No creators have tagged this product yet.
Articles featuring this product
Building a Budget Videography Kit for YouTube and Social Media: Best Value Lighting and Accessories
Jun 6, 2026
·
Unique Photo
Lightroom vs. Capture One for Wedding Photography: The Practical Buying Guide
Apr 25, 2026
·
Unique Photo
Community questions about this gear
Ask a question
0
votes
2
answers
98
How can I create a smooth gradient background for product photos?
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
9y ago
0
votes
2
answers
96
How can I create high-contrast portraits on black or white backgrounds at home?
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
16y ago
0
votes
2
answers
109
0
votes
2
answers
91
How can I get a solid black background in portraits without relying on post-processing?
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
15y ago

