Will Canon’s EF 50mm f/1.4 autofocus better than the EF 50mm f/1.8 in low light?

Asked 9/22/2012

1 views

2 answers

0

I use a Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 and like its sharpness and shallow depth of field, but at f/1.8 many shots look soft unless I stop down to around f/3.5 or smaller. In low light, manual focus in Live View is too slow for candid people photos.

Would switching to the Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 improve autofocus accuracy or speed, especially when shooting wide open? Also, how much practical difference is there between f/1.8 and f/1.4 for depth of field and exposure, and is the upgrade worthwhile for this use?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

13y ago

2 Answers

5

One thing to note about the 50mm F/1.8 is that it's a fairly cheaply constructed lens. If you touch the focus ring you should notice that there's some slack in it whereas if you use other lenses of a higher quality you'll notice that they are much more tightly constructed. While the slack in that part of the focus ring probably isn't directly relevant to the precision of the AF, it's a good indicator of the overall quality of the build of the lens and if you can imagine that same kind of precision on the AF motor then as you use AF you can see how it won't be as crisp as you might expect.

Two things you can do: use a smaller aperture (few lenses are their sharpest wide open) and refocus. If your focus has to travel very far then the momentum may carry it beyond where the camera intended for it to stop. So get focused once, then release the focus button (probably your shutter button) and refocus. The second time it shouldn't move very far, but probably will still adjust, and will hopefully come out sharper.

Also keep in mind that AF sensors are not perfect. The CEO of LensRentals.com has several blog posts talking about AF which are good reads if you're into details. The short version: even with the best cameras and best lenses (calibrated for each other) and under the best conditions, AF can still show an alarming amount of variation. Consider that you're using probably the cheapest lens on the market (though it has an amazing price:performance ratio, it's still quite cheap) and probably not the best camera available and you can see how you start noticing the imperfections.

Pat yourself on the back, your skill is outpacing your gear.

EDIT: Link to LensRentals.com blog - http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2012/07/autofocus-reality-part-1-center-point-single-shot-accuracy

Originally by user9510. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user9510

13y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

Possibly a little, but don’t expect miracles. The EF 50mm f/1.4 is only about 1/2 stop faster than the f/1.8, so the exposure gain is modest. Depth of field at 50mm and close portrait distances is extremely thin at both f/1.8 and f/1.4, so missed focus is very noticeable wide open.

The f/1.4 may focus faster because it uses a micro-USM motor, and the extra light can help AF somewhat in dim conditions. But most lenses are not at their sharpest wide open, so it’s normal to get better results around f/2, f/2.8, or f/4.

If your subject fills the frame, you often cannot keep both near and far facial features sharp at f/1.8 or f/1.4. That may be depth-of-field limitation rather than bad autofocus.

Before upgrading, check technique and setup: use the appropriate AF mode, refocus if needed, and consider whether your camera supports AF microadjustment. If possible, test the lens on another body too.

So: the f/1.4 can offer somewhat faster AF and a slight low-light advantage, but it won’t eliminate the fundamental shallow-DOF challenge of shooting wide open.

UniqueBot

AI

13y ago

Your Answer