Will a cheap bridge camera be an upgrade from my old Nikon D70 DSLR?

Asked 8/29/2016

2 views

2 answers

0

I’m an amateur photographer using an older Nikon D70 with a 28–80mm f/3.5–5.6 lens. I mostly shoot landscapes, towns, seascapes, nearby people/objects, and general travel or memory photos. I’m considering replacing it with an inexpensive bridge/superzoom camera such as the Sony DSC-H400 because the long zoom looks appealing and my D70 is aging.

Would a budget bridge camera like this actually give me better image quality than the D70 for these kinds of photos, or would I lose important features? I’m especially interested in whether a superzoom bridge camera is a good replacement for an older DSLR, and what trade-offs I should expect.

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

9y ago

2 Answers

20

In general you will find a great deal of distaste for bridge cameras here and on most photography forums. In a few unique circumstances they can be good options (very inexpensive super zoom) but for most people they aren't recommended.

Sensor size is a big deal

Why not get a bridge camera? Since they were introduced and became somewhat popular, the market has generally moved past them for one main reason. The sensors that most bridge cameras have are tiny and not well suited to the demands of today's digital photographers. The sensor that you will find in a standard bridge camera is similar in sized to what you will find in a regular smartphone of today. In other words, beyond having a physical optical zoom and some dedicated buttons, you really aren't getting much else beyond what most people already carry in their pockets.

You are right that the Nikon D70 is showing its age. But it still has the ability for interchangeable lenses which makes it somewhat capable even compared to a bridge camera of today.

To compare, the Sony bridge camera you are looking at has an image sensor of 6.17 x 4.55 mm (1/2.3") in size. The Nikon D70 has an image sensor of 23.7 mm × 15.6 mm.

What I would recommend

If you really want better quality, but can't spend much more, you are going to be severely limited in your options. I would advise a used model that is 2-3 generations old. The D70 is 7 generations old currently so it is showing its age. If you don't feel the need to stick with a DSLR(which I don't think you necessarily need to either), I would advise looking at mirrorless camearas such as the Sony RX-100 (1st generation), which you can get in your price range and still take excellent shots with. Note that some but not all mirrorless cameras do offer much larger sensors compared to the bridge camera you are looking at, plus of course could be purchased with features of a much newer camera.

Conclusion

So, in the end; only you can determine what is the best camera for you and your budget. But be aware that you will find a largely negative impression of bridge cameras here and on similar websites when comparing these two cameras due to the sensor size.

See also:

Note: some people consider mirrorless cameras bridge cameras too. In my answer I am considering them separate lines.

Originally by user4892. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user4892

9y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

Probably not. For your uses, a cheap bridge camera is unlikely to be a real image-quality upgrade over the D70, and in some ways it may be a step back.

The main issue is sensor size: budget bridge cameras usually have much smaller sensors than a DSLR, which means more noise, less flexibility in low light, and stronger image smoothing. You may gain huge zoom range, but not necessarily better photos.

From the examples and comments, several problems are more about technique and processing than camera age: camera shake, heavy brightening/post-processing, and possible sensor dust. A newer camera won’t automatically fix those.

You may also lose useful features: the Sony model mentioned does not shoot RAW, which limits editing flexibility compared with your DSLR.

If your main subjects are landscapes and nearby people/objects, you may not actually need extreme zoom. Your current camera is still capable for those subjects if cleaned and used carefully.

Best advice from the answers: keep the Nikon for now, clean the sensor, improve technique/workflow, and try before buying if possible. If you do want a bridge camera, treat it as a convenience/superzoom choice—not an image-quality upgrade.

UniqueBot

AI

9y ago

Your Answer