Why use ISO if aperture and shutter speed also control exposure?
Asked 9/28/2017
5 views
2 answers
0
I’m learning exposure and understand that aperture, shutter speed, and ISO all affect brightness, but they also affect different parts of the image. Aperture changes depth of field, shutter speed affects motion blur, and ISO increases sensitivity/gain but can add noise.
If a scene is too dark or too bright, why not just adjust aperture and shutter speed instead of ISO? What role does ISO play if the other two can also change exposure? Is ISO mainly for situations where I need a specific depth of field or shutter speed and can’t change them further without affecting the look of the photo?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
8y ago
2 Answers
11
All three have different uses and different .
Aperture
- by closing your aperture you're increasing depth of field and sacrificing light
- by opening your aperture you're decreasing depth of field, blurring the background and gathering more light
Shutter speed
- using faster speed you can freeze subject motion and camera shake (if any), but you're decreasing amount of light your sensor receives
- using longer speed you usually make scenes dreamy, with blurred motion and you're prone camera shake. You also increase amount of gathered light.
ISO
- by using higher iso you're increasing gain, which allows you to shoot with faster shutter speeds or smaller apertures, while sacrificing image quality (depends on the sensor, to some extent it's usually not visible) and increasing noise, because you're not getting more light, you're just amplifying the signal. It's similar to what happens to sound when you crank up the volume - it gets too distorted if you turn the knob too much
Let's say you want to shoot with high shutter speed (e.g. 1/400) to freeze motion and have a fairly small aperture like f/16, but it's getting dark. You can only use higher ISO to match these requirements. To what extent this will be possible depends on the used sensor. Some are way too noisy at 800-1600, so that can limit your ability to capture the image you want. If you have a better low light performing sensor (like in some full frame camera), you can easily shoot at 3200-6400 ISO and still get acceptable image quality with barely any noise.
The best rule about ISO is usually this: shoot with the lowest possible ISO to get the image you want.
Originally by user10413. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user10413
8y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
Aperture, shutter speed, and ISO all affect exposure, but they do different jobs.
- aperture controls depth of field
- shutter speed controls motion blur and camera shake
- ISO changes the sensor’s gain/sensitivity, making the image brighter at the cost of more noise and reduced image quality
In practice, you usually choose aperture and shutter speed first based on how you want the photo to look. For example, you may want a wide aperture for blurred background, or a fast shutter speed to freeze action. Once those are set, ISO lets you reach a usable exposure when you can’t open the aperture more or use a slower shutter safely.
This is common in low light: you may already be at the widest aperture and the slowest shutter speed you can hand-hold or use without subject blur, and the image is still too dark. Raising ISO is then the remaining option.
So yes: use the lowest ISO you can, but ISO is essential when aperture and shutter speed are already limited by creative or practical needs.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI8y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Why is ISO considered part of the exposure triangle if it mainly changes gain?
How are ISO, aperture, and shutter speed related?
Can the Nikon D5100 preview exposure changes on the LCD before taking a photo?
How can I reduce too much light when taking a photo?
How does a camera choose aperture and shutter speed in full auto mode?