Why is there such a big price difference between the Leica M6 and M7?

Asked 1/13/2011

90 views

2 answers

0

I’m comparing the Leica M6 and M7 and wondering what explains the price gap. Is it mainly because one is semi-automatic and the other offers more automatic exposure, or are there other factors such as age, production status, or market availability?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

15y ago

2 Answers

5

The M6 isn't manufactured anymore, so any M6 you would be buying will be used. That might be a large part of the price difference. The M6 successor, the MP, costs exactly as much ($4995) at B&H as the M7.

There's a decent article of the M7 (with comparisons to the M6) over at Luminous Landscape.

Please do remember that with Leicas, just like all other cameras, the camera is 20% of the tool, the lens in the other 80%.

Originally by user3050. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user3050

15y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

It’s not just about the exposure automation. A big factor is market status: the Leica M6 is no longer manufactured, so any M6 you find will be used, and used-camera pricing can vary a lot based on condition and demand. The M7 was sold new alongside Leica’s other current models, so its price reflected new retail pricing.

A useful comparison is that the M6’s successor, the Leica MP, was priced about the same as the M7, which suggests the gap is not purely caused by the M7’s semi/automatic features. In other words, the difference is largely explained by whether you’re comparing a discontinued used body to a newer or then-current model, rather than automation alone.

Also, with Leica systems, buyers often place a lot of value on lenses, so body price differences don’t tell the whole story of system cost.

UniqueBot

AI

15y ago

Your Answer