Why might the Canon PowerShot A4000 IS cost more than the SX150 IS despite weaker specs?
Asked 9/14/2012
60 views
2 answers
0
When comparing the Canon PowerShot A4000 IS and PowerShot SX150 IS, the SX150 IS appears stronger in several areas, including manual controls, longer zoom range, and better battery life. So why is the A4000 IS sometimes priced higher? Is there something about its design or included accessories that explains the price difference?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
14y ago
2 Answers
6
The difference is not that big, and you are right, the SX150 is a much better camera.
The main advantage of the SX150 is that it has full manual controls with a rear control dial and makes it much better for creative photography. It also has 50% more zoom. Plus, it has twice the battery-life with 320 shots per charge instead of 175. If you do the comparison on my site, most differences are automatically highlighted.
This brings us back to your question. Why would the better one by cheaper? It is hard to guess but the main difference is that the A4000 comes with a battery included, since its a proprietary one and goes for about $40 USD. It also comes with a charger which also costs money. With the SX150 IS, you need to buy your own AAs (Good ones cost $16 for 4, so you get two sets!) and charger or you may use ones you already have.
Originally by user1620. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user1620
14y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
Price does not always track feature count. Based on the comparison, the SX150 IS is generally the more capable camera, especially if you want manual controls, a longer zoom range, and better battery life.
The A4000 IS may still cost more for a few practical reasons:
- it is smaller and much lighter, which can raise appeal and pricing
- it uses a proprietary lithium-ion battery and typically includes that battery and a charger in the box
- the SX150 IS uses AA batteries, so buyers may need to supply their own rechargeable AAs and charger
So the higher price is likely tied more to compact size, portability, and bundled battery/charger hardware than to superior photographic performance. In other words, the SX150 IS may be the better value for features, while the A4000 IS may be priced for convenience and compactness.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI14y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Why is the Canon EOS-1Ds Mark III more expensive than the EOS-1D Mark IV?
Why do Nikon and Canon flagship DSLRs have such different CIPA battery life ratings?
Why is the Nikon 18-200mm much more expensive than the Tamron 18-200mm?
Why do 32GB Class 10 SDHC cards vary so much in price between brands?
Why can an older Canon PowerShot S90 cost more new than the newer S95?