Why is expanded low ISO (L/ISO 50) disabled by default on Canon DSLRs?
Asked 2/27/2013
5 views
2 answers
0
On my Canon 5D Mark III, I have to enable the expanded ISO setting before I can use the low "L" / ISO 50 option. Why isn’t this available by default, and is there a technical reason Canon keeps it separate from the normal ISO range?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
13y ago
2 Answers
5
Because just as the high ISO expansion is a fake one, the iso 50 is, too. It is like shooting ISO 100 and in photoshop dividing the values by 2, so you lose dynamic range (it doesn't allow you do get more o the highlights into the 14bit range). and the high iso expansion from X to 2*X is like shooting at iso X and multiplying everything, incl noise, by 2.
Originally by user11455. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user11455
13y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
Yes. On many Canon DSLRs, the expanded low setting (L / ISO 50) is not a true native sensor ISO. It’s typically achieved from the camera’s base ISO by extra processing, rather than giving the sensor more real highlight headroom.
In practice, ISO 50 is often similar to shooting at ISO 100 and then pulling the brightness down afterward. That can reduce dynamic range, especially in the highlights, compared with using the camera’s normal native ISO range. Because image quality is meaningfully compromised, manufacturers keep it disabled by default so users don’t select it without understanding the tradeoff.
The same basic idea applies to expanded high ISO settings too: they are usually processed extensions beyond the normal range rather than fully native sensitivities.
So the technical reason is that expanded ISOs are not part of the camera’s optimal, standard operating range. They require extra processing and may reduce image quality, which is why Canon makes you enable them explicitly.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI13y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Does ISO 50 on a Canon 6D Mark II give cleaner images than ISO 100 or 160?
Is the Canon 5D Mark III worth the upgrade over the 5D Mark II?
Why couldn't older DSLRs like the Canon EOS 30D record video?
Why do most digital cameras have a base ISO around 100, and why can’t they go much lower?
How can I compare two cameras objectively for low-light performance?