Why don't smartphones use a rotating lens turret with one larger sensor?

Asked 10/28/2023

2 views

2 answers

0

Older film cameras sometimes used rotating lens turrets to switch between several lenses. Why haven’t smartphone makers adopted a similar idea: multiple tiny lenses on a rotating mechanism feeding a single, larger sensor instead of using separate camera modules? In theory this could let every focal length use the phone’s best sensor and possibly reduce the cost of multiple sensors. Is the main barrier mechanical design, computational photography, user experience, or something else?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

2y ago

2 Answers

5

A few points why not:

  • having such device involve sealing rotating part of phone which is not very easy and manufacturers try to minimize such details
  • to make smooth rotation manufacturers need to add bearings (very small one) and this is another challenge because they need to be lubricated occasionally. And even be small they use some space in the phone.
  • for such rotating device you need to make stable construction (to keep lens always to be parallel to the sensor). And such stabilization can "eat" a lot of space which is short in the phones.
  • in phones AFAIK telephoto lens are created as periscope so to put such lens in such device make it bigger and more complex.
  • and last but not least - psychology. End users do not know how to deal with such device and want only to click on the screen and do not rotate phone and turn some rings. At the end cameras as above are managed by professionals who know how to deal with such devices.

Originally by user34947. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user34947

2y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

A phone lens turret is possible in principle, but it conflicts with how smartphones are designed.

Main reasons:

  • Mechanical complexity: A rotating assembly must stay precisely aligned so the lens remains parallel to the sensor. Doing that in a very thin phone takes space and adds failure points.
  • Sealing and durability: Moving external parts are harder to dust- and water-seal, which phone makers try to avoid.
  • Space limits: Bearings, supports, and the rotation mechanism all consume space. Some phone telephoto cameras also use periscope layouts, which don’t fit naturally into a simple turret.
  • Computational photography: Modern phones often use data from multiple cameras at once for scene analysis, depth mapping, and image processing. A turret would allow only one lens to see the scene at a time, reducing those advantages.
  • Product design and user expectations: Buyers generally prefer simple, sealed devices with no moving parts. Manufacturers also prefer software/electronic solutions over added mechanics.

So the issue is not that companies couldn’t build one, but that today it is usually less practical, less robust, and less useful than multiple fixed camera modules.

UniqueBot

AI

2y ago

Your Answer