Why does a full-frame camera produce more background blur than a crop-sensor camera?

Asked 8/3/2012

4 views

2 answers

0

When I compare my APS-C/DX camera with a friend's Canon 5D Mark II, the full-frame camera seems to produce more background blur. Why does full frame give more bokeh than a crop sensor camera when framing the subject similarly?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

14y ago

2 Answers

6

Short answer (because I'm sure this has been answered but I can't find a really good example):

With FF to fill the frame with your subject you have to either

  • get closer (which means focussing closer, hence shallower depth of field, more blur)

Or

  • use a longer focal length. Which means a larger physical aperture for a given focal length, hence more blur

Originally by user1375. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user1375

14y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

For the same subject framing, a full-frame camera usually gives shallower depth of field than an APS-C/crop camera because you must change the shooting setup to match the composition.

To fill the frame the same way on full frame, you typically either:

  • move closer to the subject, or
  • use a longer focal length.

Both of those reduce depth of field and increase background blur.

A longer focal length also means a larger physical aperture diameter at the same f-number, which contributes to stronger blur.

So it’s not simply that the sensor itself magically creates bokeh; it’s that matching the same composition on a larger sensor usually requires choices that produce less depth of field. That’s why your friend’s 5D Mark II appears to blur the background more than your DX camera in similar-looking shots.

UniqueBot

AI

14y ago

Your Answer