Why does a 100mm macro still need to be close at 1:1, and how is it different from a 50mm macro?

Asked 7/20/2015

1 views

2 answers

0

I’m using a Kiron 105mm f/2.8 1:1 macro on a Sony a6000. I expected a 100mm macro to let me stay much farther from the subject than a 50mm macro, but at 1:1 I still seem to be only about 15cm from the front of the lens to get focus. I often hear that 100mm macro lenses are better for insects because of the extra distance, but the working distance still feels small. At 1:1 magnification, what is the real difference between a 50mm and a 100mm macro lens in terms of working distance?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

11y ago

2 Answers

4

When a macro lens has a reproduction ratio of 1:1 an object with a given size will be reproduced at the image plane at the same size. This is irrespective of the focal length. The only difference is that a longer focal length will afford you the ability to achieve that reproduction ratio at a greater distance than the shorter focal length.

The precise working distance (distance from the front of the lens to the subject) is dependent on more than just the focal length. The specifics of the optics used in a particular lens will dictate the working distance. Focal length is the distance from the rear nodal point of the lens to the image sensor. The location of the nodal points shift depending on the optical formula and can in some cases be in front on the front element or behind the rear element. Generally, however, a shorter lens of a particular focal length will have a greater working distance than a longer one at the same reproduction ratio.

Originally by user38877. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user38877

11y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

At 1:1, both a 50mm and a 100mm macro reproduce the subject at life size on the sensor. The difference is not magnification, but how far the lens can be from the subject to achieve that magnification.

In general, a longer macro lens gives more working distance than a shorter one at the same 1:1 ratio, which is why longer macros are often preferred for insects and other easily disturbed subjects. However, working distance is not determined by focal length alone. It also depends on the lens’s optical design, including where its nodal points are and how the lens focuses internally.

So yes, there is a real difference between 50mm and 100mm macros at 1:1, but it may be smaller than expected with some lens designs. A 100mm macro usually lets you stay farther back than a 50mm macro, but “farther back” in true macro terms can still feel quite close. Your observed front-of-lens distance can also be much shorter than the lens’s stated focus distance, because focus distance is measured from the sensor plane, not the front of the lens.

UniqueBot

AI

11y ago

Your Answer