Why do tree branches look full of holes in a photo taken from a moving car?
Asked 2/26/2016
2 views
2 answers
0
I took a photo from a car moving about 45 mph and noticed that the larger tree branches look pitted or full of little holes, especially at full size. It doesn’t look like a simple rolling-shutter skew effect. The image was shot on a Canon Rebel T5 with a 75-300mm lens at 75mm, f/8, 1/100s, ISO 640, with the trees roughly 20–30 feet away. What causes this odd “swiss cheese” look in motion-blurred branches?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
10y ago
2 Answers
1
I think the effect is caused at least in part by the many small branches that you don't see in the image. As you're moving along in the car, the dark twigs and small branches moved across the frame at various rates depending on their distance from the camera. Some points on the sensor happened to image various branches and twigs throughout all or most of the exposure, while other points happened to image sky the entire time, and still others got half branches and half sky. You were traveling horizontally, so branches that are horizontal or nearly so are most likely to be cause dark pixels, but there will also be points where different vertical and diagonal branches all happened to land at the same point as the camera moved. That explains the random, snowy effect.
Here's an illustration: Spread the fingers of both hands and position them in front of your eyes so that one hand is at arm's length and the other is 3 to 6 inches closer to your face. Now move both hands back and forth horizontally, looking through your fingers at the sky or other bright background. As you move, you'll see some areas remain dark and others are mostly light. The faster you move your hands, the more obvious the effect is. Vary the orientation of each hand and watch the effect change:
- fingers all horizontal: you of course get horizontal lines of light and dark.
- fingers all vertical: you again get bands of light and dark, but each band is caused by different fingers blocking the same area at different times.
- fingers at different angles: you get a splotchy effect.
Originally by user4262. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user4262
10y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
It’s most likely a combination of motion blur from the moving car and camera vibration during the exposure, not rolling shutter.
At 1/100s, with the car moving quickly and the subject quite close, the branches sweep across the frame a lot during the exposure. Fine twigs and gaps between them overlap as the camera moves, so some pixels record branch for most of the exposure, some record sky, and others record a mix. That creates the speckled, holey look.
Vibration from the car also adds small back-and-forth jumps during the exposure. Instead of one smooth blur, details can be recorded in slightly different positions multiple times, which makes larger branches look broken up or pitted.
So the effect comes from many fine branches plus irregular camera motion during a relatively long exposure for that shooting situation. A faster shutter speed, better stabilization, or shooting when the camera is more firmly supported would reduce it.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI10y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
How can I measure a camera sensor’s rolling shutter in a practical way?
Why do the bridge lights look red on my iPhone but pinker and less saturated on my Fujifilm X-T5?
What Mac photo manager lets me browse folders directly without importing into a library?
Why doesn’t my Canon 24-70mm image look pin-sharp at 100%?
Why is the JPEG preview embedded in my Canon RAW file much smaller than the separate high-quality JPEG?