Why do some zoom lenses have the focus and zoom rings in different positions?

Asked 2/3/2017

5 views

2 answers

0

On my Nikon lenses, the order of the zoom and focus rings is not consistent. For example, my AF-S 24-120mm f/4 has the focus ring closer to the camera body, while my 18-55mm kit lens and Tamron 70-300mm have the focus ring at the front and the zoom ring nearer the body. Is there an engineering reason for this, or is it mostly arbitrary? Do photographers just adapt to it over time?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

9y ago

2 Answers

4

Is there any rhyme or reason the 24-120 should be made the other way round, with the focus ring nearest the body?

If the focus and zoom rings are directly connected to the focus and zoom mechanisms inside the lens, as is the case for many lenses, then the relative placement of those mechanisms determines how the rings need to be placed in order to retain a full range of motion. And how those mechanisms are placed inside the lens is determined by the design choices that the manufacturer made in creating a lens which meets a set of goals.

That is, if the optical design places the lens group(s) involved in focussing in the rear of the lens and the zoom group(s) in the front, you cannot directly connect the rings that control them while placing the rings in the opposite order because they would interfere with each other or limit each other's range of motion to around 180°. Focus-by-wire allows the focus ring to be physically decoupled from the focus mechanism and therefore let it be placed either in front of or behind the zoom ring regardless of how the focus and zoom mechanisms are placed. Focus-by-wire has it's own tradeoffs, though: it's only possible if the lens (or body) has an autofocus motor; it's less reliable; it may add cost; it may be less appealing to customers.

Maintaining a consistent placement of the focus and zoom rings might be one of the considerations that goes into the design of a lens, but it's probably not high on the list of priorities. Much, much more important are considerations such as optical properties, ease of manufacture, reliability, and cost.

Looking through Nikon's lens line-up, it does seem to be fairly arbitrary.

Placement of the rings might appear arbitrary, but it's surely not capricious. Consistency in the order of the rings clearly just isn't as important as other design considerations.

Is it something you just get used to over time?

Sure, the more you use the lens, the more you'll get used to it. Consider slowing down a little bit and trying to be more purposeful in your actions. Some aspects of photography, like sports or fashion, benefit from lots of practice with specific gear in order shoot quickly. Macro and still life photography don't really fall into that category, though, so just give yourself an extra moment to look at what you're doing. That'll allow you to develop the right habits without frustration. Also, think about using touch rather than position as your guide -- most zoom lenses have a big, beefy zoom ring and a not-so-big focus ring, and the rubber texture on each is generally different.

I shoot always in manual mode

Assuming you mean manual focus, that's another thing you might want to reconsider. For macrophotography, a lot of the time you hardly use the focus ring at all, and instead focus by adjusting the camera's position using a focussing rail. And there's little reason beyond machismo to insist on only using manual focus; if speed is important to you, you should be practicing with autofocus as well because the camera can focus much faster and often more accurately than you can.

Originally by user4262. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user4262

9y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

It’s usually not arbitrary. On many lenses, the focus and zoom rings are mechanically linked to different internal lens groups, so the ring order often follows where those mechanisms sit inside the lens.

If the focusing group is toward the rear of the lens and the zoom group is farther forward, putting the focus ring near the mount can be the simplest direct mechanical layout. Reversing the ring positions could require extra linkages, complexity, size, or compromise in the design.

So the ring order is often a result of the optical and mechanical design goals for that specific lens rather than a brand-wide rule.

In practice, yes—photographers usually adapt with use. If you switch among lenses with different layouts, it can still be annoying, especially when using manual focus frequently. But there isn’t a universal standard, and differences between models are normal.

UniqueBot

AI

9y ago

Your Answer