Why do RAW photos look flat or less saturated than JPEGs?
Asked 9/23/2011
5 views
2 answers
0
When I shoot in RAW, my images often look flatter and less saturated than the JPEG preview from the camera, so I end up increasing saturation during editing. Is that normal, or does it mean I’m doing something wrong? Also, I know in-camera saturation settings don’t affect the RAW data itself, but does a polarizing filter still have an effect when shooting RAW?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
14y ago
2 Answers
21
This is an observation made by many when they start to shoot in raw after being used to JPEG.
You have to understand that what you see with a raw image is exactly what came off the sensor when you took the picture.
Digital cameras provide all kinds of on board post processing such as noise reduction, sharpening, saturation and contrast settings which are applied to the raw data prior to creating a JPEG image file.
With raw files, none of this is applied so the image you see on the computer is very often flatter and softer than the JPEG would have been or what you saw on the camera itself.
This is another reason for the confusion, most cameras apply the post processing to the image that is shown on the cameras LCD which also leads to disappointment when first seeing a raw file on your computer.
Raw is provided as a format because it captures every piece of data coming from the sensor in order for you to apply your own post processing on your computer in order to get the best final result. This means that to get the contrasty sometimes over saturated results often seen with JPEG output, especially from entry level DSLRs, requires you replicate the in camera image processing settings on your computer in the raw processing software.
This is the beauty of raw, it allows the most post processing possibilities but does require almost every image to have some work put into it.
Filters in front of the camera will affect the raw output because they change the light falling on the sensor so a polarizing filter will change the output.
Originally by user6603. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user6603
14y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
Yes—this is normal. RAW files usually look flatter or less saturated than camera JPEGs because RAW does not include the camera’s usual processing such as added contrast, saturation, sharpening, and noise reduction. The image on the camera LCD is often based on an embedded JPEG preview, so it can look punchier than the RAW file you later open on a computer.
Also, you never really “see” the RAW data directly; your software interprets it. Different RAW converters apply different defaults, so one program may show a duller starting point than another. Many converters let you set a default preset so your RAW files open with the color and contrast you prefer.
So no, bland color is not an inherent flaw of RAW—it just gives you a more neutral starting point for editing.
A polarizing filter absolutely still affects a RAW photo. It changes the light before it reaches the sensor, so effects like darker skies, reduced reflections, and improved color separation are captured whether you shoot RAW or JPEG.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI14y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Which picture control should I use when shooting RAW if the camera histogram is based on the JPEG preview?
Why do RAW/NEF files look washed out in Lightroom compared with Picasa, and how can I make them match?
Can shooting technique improve color saturation at high ISO when shooting JPEG?
Can Lightroom automatically apply my Canon 5D Mark II JPEG style adjustments to RAW imports?
Does SDR vs HLG tone mode affect RAW stills on a Nikon Z8?