Why do photos taken with flash look less noisy at ISO 800 or 1600?
Asked 11/28/2012
8 views
2 answers
0
When I shoot with the built-in flash on my Canon T3/1100D, images at ISO 800 or 1600 seem to show much less visible noise than shots taken without flash. I haven’t done a pixel-level comparison, but the difference is noticeable.
Why does adding flash make high-ISO photos look cleaner? Is it just because the flash adds more light, or am I misunderstanding something?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
13y ago
2 Answers
10
Assuming all other exposure settings with and without flash are equal, then using flash means you are adding light to the scene. Increased light in the scene means increased light down the lens, which means more light at the sensor. That means you have a higher signal to noise ratio at the sensor, which generally means less noise.
Signal to Noise ratio, or S/N, is extremely important to the amount and quality of noise in digital photography. Every pixel in a sensor has a certain range of luminance it supports, from the read noise floor (not quite pure black, but close to it) to pure red, green, or blue (at ISO 100 this is called full well capacity, and generally termed maximum saturation at all ISO settings). A pure red, for example, would be maximum S/N for that pixel. A pixel of an 18% gray card would be roughly 50% S/N. The lower the signal, the more apparent noise (of which photon noise dominates) will be. The higher the signal, the less apparent noise will be.
Any time you can add light to your scene, be it flash, other artificial light, or even sources of natural light, will usually improve the signal to noise ratio. At higher ISO, your maximum saturation will be a fraction of the full well capacity, which is almost the same as underexposing (at ISO 100) one stop for each stop of ISO, then pushing exposure in post by the same amount. If you underexpose at ISO 100 by two stops then boost by two stops in post, that would be similar to using ISO 400 (with the added caveat that you'll boost read noise as well when pushing in post, but let's assume an "ideal" sensor for the sake of simplifying discussion.)
If you underexposed by three stops, then pushed in post, that would be similar to using ISO 800. Before pushing in post, you'll notice that the image is pretty dark. If you do the same thing, underexpose by three stops at ISO 100...but add flash...the unmodified image in post should be a bit brighter than the first shot that was underexposed by three stops. Flash adds light, which increases signal level. Boost both images such that they appear the same post, and the second shot should appear less noisy, even if only by a small margin....it will require LESS of a boost to exposure to correct.
Originally by user124. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user124
13y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
It’s real: flash often makes high-ISO images look cleaner because it adds light, which improves the signal-to-noise ratio.
At a given ISO, noise is most visible when the sensor receives very little light. In a dim scene without flash, the camera is trying to record a weak signal, so random sensor/read noise is a larger part of the image. When you fire the flash, more light reaches the sensor, so the actual image data is stronger relative to that noise.
So even if the ISO stays at 800 or 1600, the photo can look less noisy simply because exposure on the subject is better.
In short:
- more light from the flash = stronger signal
- stronger signal relative to noise = cleaner-looking image
This is especially noticeable with underexposed high-ISO shots, where noise becomes obvious. Flash doesn’t remove noise by itself; it improves the amount of useful light captured.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI13y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Why is ISO noise sometimes obvious and sometimes hardly visible?
Why are my photos dark in manual mode with a Nikon D5200 and 18-105mm lens?
How can I reduce noise when shooting indoor hockey with a Canon 70D and 55-250mm lens?
Why do two photos shot at ISO 160 and ISO 1600 look almost the same?
For Milky Way shots, is a shorter exposure at higher ISO better than a longer exposure at lower ISO?