Why do image averaging and lower resolution reduce noise?
Asked 8/6/2012
14 views
2 answers
0
I’ve seen two suggested ways to reduce image noise: averaging multiple photos of the same scene, and lowering the image resolution. Why do these work? How do you average multiple photos in practice, and what kinds of noise does this help with?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
14y ago
2 Answers
10
The last two are really the same thing and works due to the fact that in most cases noise is just as likely to push the value of a pixel up as it is to pull the value down.
Let's say the 'true' value of a given pixel is 100 (out of 255). Take 10 images of the same scene in noisy conditions and you might record the following values:
104, 99, 98, 100, 101, 105, 99, 102, 94, 105
averaging these values (by adding them up and dividing by 10) gives the following pixel value: 100.7, which will round to 101, which is much closer to the true value than you would expect to be if you had to choose only one of the 10 images at random.
As for the how, there are specialist software packages for this (search for image stacking, I think Deep Sky Stacker is a popular choice). Alternatively you can do it in most image editing by loading several layers and merging pairs of layers (more recent versions of photoshop have special stacking functions which are a bit better).
The same principal lies behind reducing the resolution. One technique to do this is called 'binning' whereby you combine four adjacent pixels into one. So imagine four pixels corresponding to an area of flat colour within the image, which ought to have a uniform value of 100:
102, 103
93, 101
averaging them gives a single pixel with value of 99.75 which rounds to 100.
Incidentally, taking several images and averaging them is equivalent to taking a longer exposure except:
- you can let the camera cool between captures, helping with issue #1
- long exposures only work if you capture more light, which means keeping the aperture constant and lowering the ISO value (which is not always possible, e.g. if you hit the minimum ISO value)
- longer exposures can introduce camera shake, which can be avoided using several shorter exposures (though the images will need alignment).
--
Finally, when it comes to minimising noise the golden rule is to get as much light as possible. Averaging several exposures does this (it's total light captured that matters). Downsampling is really trading noise for resolution.
Originally by user1375. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user1375
14y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
Both methods rely on the same basic idea: random noise varies from shot to shot or pixel to pixel, while the real scene stays the same.
If you take several photos of a static scene and align them, each image contains the same subject plus slightly different random noise. Averaging the pixel values reduces noise because positive and negative deviations tend to cancel out, while the true signal adds consistently. This works best for random, zero-mean noise and a scene that does not move. In practice, this is done with image stacking software or with layers in an editor that supports opacity/blending.
Lowering resolution does something similar within a single image. When neighboring pixels are combined during downsampling, their random noise is averaged together, so the result looks cleaner. The tradeoff is less fine detail, because you are also averaging away some high-frequency image information.
These methods do not fix all noise equally well: they are most effective against random noise, not fixed-pattern artifacts or motion-related problems.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI14y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Does lowering a phone camera’s resolution use less of the sensor or create larger pixels?
When should you stack multiple exposures instead of using one long exposure for noise reduction?
Can you emulate camera pixel shift with multiple shots and software?
Can multiple cameras or exposures be combined to improve image quality?
Can you create a better still photo by averaging frames from a video?