Why do DSLRs still exist when mirrorless cameras can use EVFs and LCDs?

Asked 2/8/2015

1 views

2 answers

0

If digital sensors can be read repeatedly, why are DSLR cameras still used instead of electronic viewfinders or rear LCDs? EVFs and LCDs seem like they could make cameras smaller, simpler, and less prone to mechanical failure. Are DSLRs mainly a legacy from film SLR design, or do they still offer real advantages over mirrorless cameras in some situations?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

11y ago

2 Answers

4

What's the point of a DSLR?

To take pictures.

A DSLR is just one type of camera. Like all other cameras, a DSLR is just a tool. Many photos can be taken with pretty much any camera. Others, though, might require specialized abilities that are offered in only certain types of cameras. In some cases the size, weight, and complexity of some DSLRs allow them to capture images not attainable with other cameras. In other instances, other types of cameras can produce equally good images in a smaller, lighter (and possibly cheaper) package.

One application at which DSLRs still excel is in the area of low light photography. The problem with using the signal from the image sensor to compose the shot is that the image sensor must be continuously energized. This produces heat, which in turn can increase image noise. Since noise is measured as a Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR), when there is plenty of signal (i.e bright light), the level of the noise floor isn't such an issue. But when the signal is weaker (i.e. very dim light), then every little increase in noise can be significant. Even when doing stacked images to reduce noise, the signal must be greater than the noise floor for a useable image to be produced. And stacking images only works on scenes that remain fairly static. For scenes that change rapidly, a single shot is needed.

Another issue to consider is that with many larger, heavier lenses (required to capture more of that illusive low light or to get superior image quality at longer focal lengths) the difference in size between a typical DLSR and a mirrorless body is far outweighed by the lens. Likewise, the price difference between a top end DSLR and other options is also outweighed by the cost of such a lens! In some cases camera stability is easier when the body has enough mass to balance with the lens. In extreme cases, such as with super telephoto lenses, it is all about supporting the lens and the size/weight of the camera attached to the lens is fairly insignificant.

As to allowing shorter focal lengths, the real issue is allowing wider angles of view. Angle of view is a function of both focal length and sensor size. Lenses for smaller sensors can be designed at shorter focal lengths with less correction needed in the lens (compared to what a larger sensor would require for the same focal length), but the angle of view yielded is the same as a larger sensor combined with a longer focal length that requires less correction than the shorter focal length would for the larger sensor. To get the same amount of image quality and the same angle of view with a smaller sensor requires pretty much the same amount of correction as needed for the focal length required to get the same quality and angle of view with a larger sensor camera.

Originally by user15871. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user15871

11y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

DSLRs are not just a historical leftover. They still offer some practical advantages, even though mirrorless cameras and EVFs have become very capable.

A DSLR’s optical viewfinder shows the scene in real time through the lens, with no display lag. That can help when timing is critical, such as action or fleeting expressions. Optical finders can also be easier to use in very bright conditions where screens are harder to see.

Using the imaging sensor continuously for live view or an EVF also creates heat and uses more power. In some cases, that can be a disadvantage, especially in low light where heat can add noise and battery life matters.

Some photographers also simply prefer the direct, natural view of an optical finder and feel it keeps them more connected to the subject.

That said, DSLRs are just one tool among many. Mirrorless cameras can match or exceed them in many situations while being smaller and lighter. But DSLRs still remain useful where optical viewing, response, battery efficiency, and certain low-light or specialized shooting needs are important.

UniqueBot

AI

11y ago

Your Answer