Electronic vs optical viewfinders: what are the pros and cons?
Asked 2/17/2019
6 views
2 answers
0
Many mirrorless cameras use an electronic viewfinder (EVF), while DSLRs use an optical viewfinder (OVF) through the lens via a mirror. What are the main advantages and disadvantages of each? In which situations might a photographer prefer an EVF over an OVF, or vice versa?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
7y ago
2 Answers
8
Electronic viewfinder Pros:
- Potentially smaller and lighter camera bodies and lenses (particularly wide angle lenses)
- Can zoom in to verify precise focus and depth of field
- Can see (almost) exactly what the camera sees, even in low light
- Can superimpose more complex data over the image (e.g. zebra stripes, focus peaking); see note below.
- No mirror assembly to fail
- Quieter shooting (no mirror motion)
Electronic viewfinder cons:
- Uses significantly more battery power
- Lower resolution when not zoomed in (harder to judge focus by eye)
- Temporarily obliterates night vision when used in the dark, making it hard to get around
- Slight latency (worse on older gear)
- Unless combined with electronic front curtain, significantly longer shutter lag (because it starts out open)
- For cameras without a fully enclosed viewfinder, light from screen can annoy others
- For cameras without dual-pixel autofocus or dedicated focus pixels, significantly less reliable focusing
Note that it is possible to overlay some data over optical viewfinders, of course, such as focus point dots, boundaries of focus zones, and so on. However, transmissive LCDs are much more limited in terms of what can be superimposed practically, because they can basically only darken, not lighten the image.
Eventually, when transparent OLEDs make their way into DSLRs, this difference will go away, but as far as I know, they have not appeared in any DSLRs yet.
Originally by user25054. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user25054
7y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
An EVF shows a processed preview of what the camera will record, while a DSLR’s OVF shows the scene optically through the lens and mirror.
EVF advantages:
- Shows exposure, white balance, crop/aspect ratio, and often depth of field more closely to the final image
- Can offer overlays and aids like focus peaking, zebras, and magnified manual focus
- Works better for previewing in low light
- No mirror slap, so cameras can be quieter and mechanically simpler
EVF disadvantages:
- Uses much more battery power
- Can have lag, lower apparent resolution, and sometimes blackout depending on the camera
- Bright EVFs can ruin your night vision in dark environments
OVF advantages:
- No display lag; the view is natural and continuous
- Works with the camera off and uses little to no power for viewing
- Many photographers prefer the clarity and immediacy for action and general shooting
OVF disadvantages:
- Doesn’t preview exposure, white balance, or many display aids
- Depth-of-field preview is limited in practical use because stopping down makes the finder dim
- DSLR mirrors cause brief blackout during exposure
In short: choose EVF for preview accuracy and shooting aids; choose OVF for a natural, lag-free view and better battery life.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI7y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Grids vs. snoots for controlling studio light
When should I use a DSLR's optical viewfinder vs live view for focusing and composition?
Why choose a mirrorless camera with an electronic viewfinder?
Does using the EVF instead of the rear screen improve mirrorless camera battery life?
What are the main advantages and disadvantages of mirrorless cameras compared with DSLRs?