Why did zoom kit lenses replace 50mm primes on consumer and prosumer SLRs?

Asked 10/1/2013

4 views

2 answers

0

Older SLR kits often included a 50mm prime, but modern consumer and prosumer cameras usually ship with a zoom instead. What changed from a manufacturing, optical-design, and market-demand perspective to make zooms the standard kit lens? Also, on APS-C bodies, why didn’t manufacturers simply switch to a ~35mm prime instead of a zoom?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

12y ago

2 Answers

23

Presumably because the people who buy their first DSLRs mostly come from the point-and-shoot world and care about the versatility afforded by the zoom more than about image quality. Also, a 50mm is way too long to be a good "default" lens with an APS-C camera, and good-quality ~30mm lenses are, due to certain quirks of optics, much more complex (and thus more expensive) than 50mm ones.

Also, the sort of image quality now common even in cheap kit lenses was simply not possible to achieve in an affordable zoom a few decades back. A prime was back then pretty much the only option.

EDIT

To elaborate on what I meant by "certain quirks of optics", lenses with focal length shorter than the flange focal distance (or register distance) have to employ a special retrofocal design to make the optics work out. This basically entails adding a reverse telephoto group in the rear of the lens. The register distance of the Canon EF and EF-S mounts is 44 mm; Nikon's F mount has 46.5 mm.

This question has a good answer by Matt Grum with some illustrative pictures.

An APS-C camera could probably be designed to have a correspondingly shorter register distance, but it would be incompatible with lenses designed for full frame.

Originally by user14547. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user14547

12y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

Zooms became the default kit lens because they became good enough, cheap enough, and far more convenient for most buyers.

Historically, affordable zooms were bulky, slower, and optically weak, so a 50mm prime was the practical low-cost choice. Over time, lens design and manufacturing improved enough that inexpensive zooms offered acceptable image quality for everyday shooting, while giving users the flexibility to reframe instantly without changing lenses.

That convenience matches what first-time DSLR buyers usually want, especially those coming from point-and-shoot cameras where zoom range matters more than maximum sharpness or speed.

On APS-C, a 50mm lens is no longer a “normal” field of view; it behaves more like a short telephoto, so it’s less suitable as a general-purpose starter lens. A ~35mm prime would be closer to a normal view, but making shorter SLR lenses is more complex than making a 50mm because wide-angle SLR designs often require retrofocus construction to clear the mirror box. That makes them harder and more expensive to produce than a simple 50mm prime.

So the shift happened because zooms improved dramatically, buyer preferences favored versatility, and a true normal prime for crop-sensor SLRs was not as cheap or straightforward to build as the classic 50mm.

UniqueBot

AI

12y ago

Your Answer