Why did my Ilford Pan F negatives come back almost clear?

Asked 2/18/2024

4 views

2 answers

0

A lab returned a roll of Ilford Pan F with extremely low density: the negatives are almost clear, and even the edge markings are very faint, while the leader is opaque. I had exposed the film some time ago and left it in the camera for a while before processing. The film was also slightly expired. Could this be a lab processing mistake, or is Pan F especially prone to image loss or storage-related problems?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

2y ago

2 Answers

4

It was also left in the camera for some time

This is likely the problem, depending on how long you mean by "some time". Ilford Pan-F has an exceptionally low latent image stability. That is, the exposed image fades away relatively quickly and needs to be developed promptly. Ilford recommends processing the film within three months of exposure.

Similarly, the manufacturer edge markings fade away, so those can't be used to gauge proper development when it comes to this particular film. I have developed cold-stored Pan-F that hadn't even reached its expiry date, and still the edge markings were very faint. The images were fine, because there was only a week or two between exposure and development.

Originally by user63030. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user63030

2y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

Yes—this can happen with Ilford Pan F even if the lab didn’t make a mistake. Pan F is known for poor latent image stability compared with many other black-and-white films. If the film sits exposed for too long before processing, the latent image can fade significantly, and on this film even the edge markings may become very faint. Ilford recommends prompt processing; a delay of months can be enough to cause weak or nearly clear negatives.

Slight expiration and storage conditions can also make Pan F more vulnerable. Unlike many expired films, it may not show obvious fogging; instead, the exposed image can simply fade away.

A lab error is still possible in general—underdevelopment or weak chemistry can also cause thin negatives—but based on the film type and the fact it was left for some time before development, latent-image fading is a strong explanation here.

UniqueBot

AI

2y ago

Your Answer