Why did lenses move from full-stop apertures to half- and third-stop increments?
Asked 10/25/2016
5 views
2 answers
0
Older lenses often have only full-stop aperture markings, while many newer lenses and cameras allow half- or one-third-stop aperture adjustments. If full-stop settings were often enough for correct exposure, what drove lens and camera makers to add finer aperture increments? Was it mainly for exposure precision, for compatibility with auto-exposure modes, or just convenience? And is there any practical reason to go finer than one-third stop, given that aperture is still specified in f-stops rather than exact transmitted light (T-stops)?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
9y ago
2 Answers
13
Historically, the unit of exposure was a doubling or halving of the exposing energy. This is the origin of the f/stop. Initially, this adjustment was made by inserting a thin metal plate with a circular hole, into a slit in the lens barrel. The photographer had a series of these metal slides called Waterhouse Stops after John Waterhouse circa 1858. The Waterhouse stop was superseded by the mechanical iris diaphragm. (You can see early examples of both in this video from Roger Cicala at lensrentals.com) To achieve a 2X change the aperture diameter must be enlarged or contracted such that the surface area of the hole is doubled or halved. To accomplish a 2X change, the diameter of the hole must enlarged or contracted using a multiplier of divider of 1.414 (square root of 2).
As an example, say a 50mm lens is mounted and set to f/8. The diameter of the hole in the iris will be 6.25mm. To open up this lens to f/5.6 the revised diameter will be 8.82mm. To stop down to f/11, the revised diameter must be 4.42mm. What I am trying to say is, given that the leaves of the iris are adjusted by a gear train, precision is challenging.
To make a ½ f/stop change, the multiplier is the forth root 2 = 1.19. To make a 1/3 stop change, the diameter modification is the sixth root of 2 = 1.12. In other words, as we make smaller and smaller adjustments the needed precision adds cost.
Please note: With black & white films, the resulting negatives are useless until printed. The printing operation is comparable taking a picture of the negative substituting light sensitive paper for film. This second exposure (printing) allows for adjustments to be made to mitigate errors made during the initial film exposure. In all most every case, a camera precision of greater than 1 f/stop was not necessary.
With the advent of more complex materials like positive black & white and color slide film, the need to improve exposure accuracy is evident. This inspired the 1/2 and 1/3 iris adjustments.
Now long focal length lenses are the “norm” for large film cameras. When we are adjusting longer lens the amount of accuracy of the gear adjustment of the iris is not a problem because the hole size change to make a 1/3 stop change is hefty. If the focal length is short, then 1/3 f/stop changes become problematic. Example: A 28mm set to f/8 has a diameter of 3.5mm. To close down to f/11, the revised diameter works out to be 3.125mm, not an easy mechanical change.
Originally by user44949. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user44949
9y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
Aperture control started with full stops because exposure was historically thought of in doublings/halvings of light. Since aperture area, not diameter, determines light, each full stop changes the f-number by a factor of √2.
Older systems were limited by mechanical design and workflow: full stops were simple, practical, and usually sufficient because exposure tolerance in film/printing was fairly forgiving. Photographers could also fine-tune exposure with shutter speed, development, or printing.
Half- and later third-stop increments were added mainly for finer exposure control and convenience. Aperture is only one part of exposure; shutter speed and ISO also change exposure, and finer steps make it easier for manual, aperture-priority, shutter-priority, and auto-exposure systems to hit a desired value without larger jumps.
It’s also not only about exposure: aperture affects depth of field and image rendering, while shutter speed affects motion blur, so smaller steps give more control over the tradeoffs.
There isn’t a hard technical requirement that all three exposure variables use the same step size, but matching finer increments is more practical. Going much finer than one-third stop usually offers diminishing real-world benefit relative to mechanical complexity, tolerances, and the fact that f-stops are already an approximation of transmitted light.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI9y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
How can you practically measure a lens’s T-stop or light transmission?
Why do cameras use standard ISO, shutter speed, and aperture steps instead of infinitely fine settings?
How does the Canon EOS 55 light meter scale work?
Why do cameras only offer certain shutter speeds and aperture settings?
What is a T-stop, and how does it differ from an f-stop?