Why can different lenses produce more or less color saturation?
Asked 6/20/2011
2 views
2 answers
0
Reviews sometimes say one lens gives “stronger colors” or more saturation than another, even when the focal length is similar (for example, a 50mm f/1.8 vs. a 50mm f/1.4). What aspects of lens design cause this? Is it the glass itself, the coatings, flare resistance, or something else?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
15y ago
2 Answers
16
The quality and makeup of the lens elements used in a camera lens can have an effect on transmission. Top-notch glass will usually have high transmission, allowing through as much visible light as possible while filtering as little as possible. However, top-notch glass will also usually have coatings, usually multi-coating, that will have its own effect on transmission, and may introduce color cast or affect flaring. Glass that is not coated or cheaply coated will usually exhibit more flaring, which can have a significant impact on scene contrast.
Cheap glass may not have a high transmission index, in which case for a given exposure value, the overall contrast may be lower than quality glass that has a higher transmission index. Contrast affects both luminance as well as color saturation, and lower overall scene contrast in a color photo will usually also affect the apparent saturation of color. Cheaper glass or cheaper lenses may also exhibit various optical aberrations, many of which are explicitly related to the convergence or divergence in how different wavelengths of light focus. This can create purple/green fringing as a scenes depth progresses and focus changes, which can also have an effect on color and saturation.
Higher quality lenses will usually have better control of flare, higher transmission glass, better multi-coating that has a minimal impact on transmitted light, fewer optical aberrations, etc. etc. This all affects the ultimate quality of the images produced, and is most visible in contrast (both overall scene and micro contrast, the latter being an effect of lens resolution) and color saturation. Thus is the benefit of a high quality, more expensive lens...you really do get what you pay for.
Originally by user124. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user124
15y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
A lens can affect perceived saturation mainly through transmission, coatings, and flare control.
- Coatings and glass transmission: Different glass types and coatings pass light differently. Better coatings usually transmit light more evenly across the visible spectrum, while some coatings can slightly favor or suppress certain wavelengths, causing a mild color cast.
- Flare and internal reflections: This is often the biggest reason. A lens that is more prone to flare or veiling glare lowers overall contrast, and lower contrast makes colors look less saturated. Even subtle flare from bright light just outside the frame can wash out color.
- Contrast: Higher-contrast lenses often appear to have richer color, even if the actual color transmission is similar. So when reviewers say a lens has “better color,” they may really be seeing better microcontrast and less flare.
So the lens usually isn’t “adding saturation” directly; it’s more often preserving contrast and transmitting colors more neutrally and consistently.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI15y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Are 35mm and 50mm prime lenses too soft wide open for low-light indoor shooting?
Why does my Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 focus slower on EOS M than other USM lenses?
Does CCD vs CMOS sensor type affect image quality?
How do lens coatings affect internal reflections and flare on older lenses?
Sony FE 28mm f/2 vs Zeiss Distagon 35mm f/1.4 for night photography