Why can a Nikon 1 J1 look better than a Sony NEX-F3 in my low-light test?

Asked 1/11/2013

3 views

2 answers

0

I tested a Nikon 1 J1 and a Sony NEX-F3 in auto mode and was surprised that the Nikon images looked better to me in low light, even though reviews say the NEX-F3 should do better because of its larger sensor. In my test, the Sony used about 1/6 sec, f/2.8, ISO 3200 with the 16mm lens, and the Nikon used about 1/4 sec, f/3.5, ISO 3200 with the 10mm lens. Both were set to auto white balance and sRGB, and each camera also had its own dynamic-range/color settings enabled.

Why might the Nikon look cleaner or more pleasing in this kind of test? Is it because the Sony settings are not configured well, or because auto mode is making different exposure and processing decisions? What would be a better way to compare the two cameras fairly and see whether the NEX-F3 actually has the low-light advantage people describe?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

13y ago

2 Answers

5

The NEX F3 should be superior to the 1 J1 in low-light due to its larger sensors. Now you say, you see the opposite but have not mentioned how you determine superior.

The F3 has a much larger pixel count than the J1, so if you look at 100% view, it wont look as good as expect per-pixel. However if you display or print to the same size, the F3 would normally come out on top given the same image brightness.

In you example you have one image darker than the other. This of course makes noise stand out more on the darker image since noise appears as a signal-to-noise ratio. This means that the darker the image, the more noise is apparent.

The two icons are see are for Standard color rendition and Adaptive D-Lighting. This is Nikon's equivalent of Sony's Dynamic Range Optimizer (DRO). If you want the best quality, you need to turns this off on both cameras. What they do is boost the dark parts of the image to make them brighter, but this amplifies noise. Depending on which setting, you get different amplification. In my opinion it also makes most images look worse because it reduces contrast.

Of course letting more light in improves the image quality of any camera and so shooting with a larger aperture is better if that gives you the shot you need. If on one camera you can afford a lens with a brighter aperture that will influence your perception of results.

Originally by user1620. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user1620

13y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

Yes—your result is possible, but it does not prove the J1 is better in low light.

The main issue is that this was not an equal test. The cameras used different shutter speeds and likely different metering and in-camera processing. A darker image will often show more visible noise, so if the Sony exposed darker, it can look worse even if the sensor is actually better. Also, the Nikon settings you saw include Standard color and Adaptive D-Lighting, which is similar to Sony’s DRO; these processing features can change how images look.

Another factor is resolution: the NEX-F3 has more pixels, so at 100% view it may look noisier per pixel. If both files are viewed or printed at the same final size, the Sony would normally be expected to do better.

For a fair comparison, use the same scene, same framing, same brightness, and manually match exposure settings as closely as possible. Turn off dynamic-range and other automatic image-enhancement features. Then compare the images at the same output size, not just at 100% zoom.

In everyday use, though, practical results matter—so test both cameras in the situations you actually shoot most.

UniqueBot

AI

13y ago

Your Answer