Why can a 17–35mm lens be physically much longer than its focal length?
Asked 5/11/2018
2 views
2 answers
0
I noticed the Nikon 17–35mm f/2.8 is about 107mm long, which seems large compared with its short focal lengths. I expected a wide-angle zoom to be much smaller, almost like a pancake lens.
Why can a lens with focal lengths from 17mm to 35mm be physically much longer than those numbers suggest? What optical design factors make a wide-angle zoom this long?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
8y ago
2 Answers
1
The focal length of the camera lens defines its fundamental property. We are talking about such things as angular field of view, relative aperture, depth of field and depth of focus. It is customary to fit lenses to cameras that have a focal length approximately equal to the diagonal measure of the format. Such a lash-up delivers a “normal” angle of view. If the lens mounted is shorter than the diagonal, the angle of view will be wide-angle.
This Nikon 17-35mm is designed to fit on a compact digital (DX) with a format that measures 16mm height by 24mm length. The corner to corner measure of this rectangle is approximately 30mm. In other words, a 30mm on your camera delivers a “normal” view.
The focal length of a lens is a measurement taken when the lens is focused on a far distant subject. We measure from a point called the rear nodal to the focused image which will be the surface of the image sensor. When a wide-angle lens is mounted such as this this one, set to 17mm, the rear nodal must be positioned 17mm from the imaging chip. This is a super short distance, only about ¾ inch.
Such a close lens positioning is virtually impossible, not enough room for lens barrel, glass, mount, aperture and other stuff. What to do? The optician must shift the rear nodal more to the rear. Normally it would fall somewhere within the lens barrel. This shift can be extreme, it could be made to fall in the air behind the lens. This design elongates the back focus distance; now there is room for everything. This is accomplished by inserting several lens elements, some with positive power and some with negative power. The correct combination resembles an inverted telephoto. This is known as a retro-focus lens. Such a lash-up is how you get a 17-35mm zoom to fit on a DX camera.
Originally by user44949. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user44949
8y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
Focal length does not describe a lens’s physical length. It describes its optical behavior: mainly angle of view, and it also relates to aperture and depth-of-field characteristics.
A lens can be shorter or longer than its stated focal length depending on its optical design. Wide-angle lenses for SLR/DSLR cameras are often physically longer because they use a retrofocus design. This design keeps the rear element farther from the sensor/film than the focal length alone would suggest, which is necessary to provide clearance for the camera’s mirror box and still deliver a wide field of view.
Zooming adds more lens groups, and a constant f/2.8 aperture requires relatively large glass elements, both of which increase size further.
So a 17–35mm lens being about 107mm long is not unusual: the focal length is an optical specification, not a ruler measurement of the barrel.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI8y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Why doesn’t a zoom lens get darker as you zoom in?
How can I take better portraits with a bridge camera superzoom?
What’s the generic term for a long-focal-length lens if “telephoto” is a specific optical design?
Why doesn’t a lens’s physical length match its focal length?
Are long prime lenses for full-frame cameras usually true telephoto designs?