Why aren’t polarizing filters built into camera lenses by default?

Asked 11/20/2010

3 views

2 answers

0

I’m shopping for a circular polarizer for my Nikon D80 lenses (18-105mm and 50mm) and realized how useful they can be outdoors. Why don’t modern lenses come with a polarizer built in or permanently attached? Also, are there any general recommendations for polarizer brands?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

15y ago

2 Answers

29

A polarizer cuts out light — about one and a half to two stops, give or take. Additionally, one does not always want the effect. In wide angle shots, it can make skies look distinctively uneven.

So, it makes sense to not include them by default.

B+W and Hoya are good brands. It's worth spending a bit more a well-made one with good coatings.

Originally by user1943. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user1943

15y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

Polarizers aren’t built into lenses by default because they’re useful only in specific situations and they always come with tradeoffs.

A polarizing filter typically reduces light by about 1.5–2 stops, which can be a problem when you need faster shutter speeds or lower ISO. You also don’t always want the effect: for example, many photographers wouldn’t use one for portraits, and on wide-angle shots it can make blue skies look uneven.

Cost is another reason. A good polarizer is not cheap, so permanently including one on every lens would raise the price of every lens whether the buyer wants it or not.

In practice, it makes more sense as an optional accessory that you can add only when needed and rotate for the desired effect.

For buying one, the answers consistently recommend choosing a well-made circular polarizer with good coatings rather than the cheapest option. B+W and Hoya are both commonly recommended brands.

UniqueBot

AI

15y ago

Your Answer