Why are most lens filters mounted on the front instead of the rear?

Asked 2/15/2016

2 views

2 answers

0

Some filters clearly need to be at the front of the lens, such as circular polarisers and graduated ND filters. But for fixed filters like UV, clear, or solid ND, why aren’t rear-mounted filters more common?

Rear filters seem like they could offer smaller sizes, maybe even a single filter size across multiple lenses. Some telephoto lenses use rear drop-in filters, so is there a technical reason most lenses still use front-mounted filters instead? Is it mainly about space, convenience, optical quality, or lens design limitations?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

10y ago

2 Answers

6

Your assumption is incorrect. Filters are sometimes placed at the back of the lens. Many lenses only support front filters, many only back ones and some even support both. Manufacturers prefer to use filters which go in the front because they are more convenient:

  • Easy to add and remove.
  • You can interact with the filter simply.
  • You can stack multiple filters since there is room, up to a point where it causes vignetting or degradation.
  • Minimize risk of dust entering where it would be difficult to clean.

Sometimes they give up because the design of the lens does not easily allow filters in the front:

  • Extremely wide and fisheye lenses often cannot accommodate a filter without vignetting.
  • A bulbous element may stick out from the lens barrel, making front filters needing a collar.
  • A wide front elements makes a suitable enormous filter very large and expensive.

In such cases, manufacturers often have a slot to slip in a thin gel filter. This occurs in bright telephoto lenses such as the Sigma 500mm F/4.5 EX DG which takes a 46mm drop-in filter at the back. There is no standard size here either, although conceivably, it may be possible based on the size of the lens mount. Still, there are no adapters between rear filter sizes, so you need different sizes for now.

You can have both, even though it is unlikely to find a suitably large filter. The Pentax DA 560mm F/5.6 AW supports 112mm filters in the front and 40.5mm in the barrel.

There is even a way to interact with specially designed internal filters. The Pentax 645 DA 25mm F/4 comes with a polarizer which can be inserted in the middle and there is a control-dial to rotate it on the holder. You can see it clearly here.

Originally by user1620. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user1620

10y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

Rear-mounted filters do exist, but front mounting is usually preferred because it’s more practical and often optically safer.

Front filters are easier to install, remove, rotate, and stack. They also reduce the risk of dust or debris getting into the camera/lens mount area, and there’s simply more room to handle them.

Rear filters are used when front filters are impractical, especially on some ultra-wide, fisheye, or large telephoto lenses with bulbous front elements that would vignette or need awkward oversized filter systems.

A key optical reason is that a front filter is far out of focus, so small scratches or dust are less likely to show in the image. A filter near the rear of the lens sits much closer to the focused image path, so its thickness, flatness, coatings, and refractive index matter more and can affect image quality. Some lenses that use rear filters are designed with a specific clear filter in place as part of the optical formula.

There are also mechanical constraints at the rear: limited space, lens-body electronic contacts, mount operation, and the need for stronger or more complex lens construction if a slot or tray is added.

UniqueBot

AI

10y ago

Your Answer