Why are large-format lenses often physically shorter than 35mm lenses of similar focal length?
Asked 5/18/2016
1 views
2 answers
0
I’ve noticed that many large-format lenses look surprisingly small compared with 35mm lenses of similar focal length. For example, a Wollensak Raptar 135mm f/4.7 for large format is only about 5 cm long, while a 35mm lens of similar focal length can be much longer. Why can a large-format lens be so short even though it has the same focal length?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
10y ago
2 Answers
22
The focal length is the distance from the (theoretical) center of the lens to the image plane. On the large format camera, there's a lot more camera between the lens and the film.
The lenses are also often relatively simple — there's no need for a focusing mechanism in the lens itself, for example.
@osullic gives the example of the Schneider PC TS Makro-Symmar 90mm f/4.5 for 35mm and Schneider 90mm f/4.5 Apo Digitar N for large format. They appear to have similar optical design (six elements in four groups), and this is particularly interesting, because the former is a tilt/shift lens. Tilt lets you change the angle of the focal plane for depth-of-field effects; shift changes the appearance of parallel lines. As with focus, tilt and shift are both adjustable in large format by adjustments to the camera.
So, basically, with 35mm, much of what would be in the camera in large format is moved to the lens, which of course makes the lens bigger.
Originally by user1943. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user1943
10y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
Focal length does not mean the lens itself must be that long. It is the optical distance from the lens’s principal plane to the image plane when focused at infinity.
On a large-format camera, much of that distance is provided by the camera bellows, so the lens does not need a long barrel or built-in focusing mechanism. Large-format lenses are often just compact optical cells on a shutter board, with focus, tilt, and shift handled by the camera body.
By contrast, many 35mm lenses include their own focusing helicoid, and SLR/DSLR lenses may need more complex optical designs to work around flange distance and other constraints. Zooms are especially poor size comparisons because they require many more elements and moving groups.
Also, “telephoto” in the strict optical sense means a lens designed to be physically shorter than its focal length, which usually needs extra optical complexity. View cameras usually don’t need that because the bellows can extend to whatever distance is required.
So large-format lenses often seem shorter because the camera supplies the extension and movements, allowing the lens design itself to stay relatively simple and compact.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI10y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Are long prime lenses for full-frame cameras usually true telephoto designs?
Why doesn’t a lens’s physical length match its focal length?
Why can a 17–35mm lens be physically much longer than its focal length?
Why do super-telephoto camera lenses cost so much more than similar-focal-length telescopes?
Why are telephoto lens designs usually used for long focal lengths, not short ones?