Why are extension tube sets commonly 13mm, 21mm, and 31mm?

Asked 4/13/2012

4 views

2 answers

0

Many extension tube kits for Canon EOS and similar systems seem to use the same three lengths: 13mm, 21mm, and 31mm. Is there a technical reason these specific sizes became common, especially for macro work?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

14y ago

2 Answers

18

It might help if you thought of everything in Imperial units rather than metric. A normal lens for 35mm cameras is a 2-inch lens (50mm), and the tubes are (approximately) 1/2-inch (13mm), 3/4-inch (21mm) and 1 1/4-inch (31mm). That makes both magnification calculation and bellows draw (exposure compensation required for the lens extension) relatively easy to calculate, whether the tubes are used alone or in combination, when the lens is focused to its infinity mark. For instance, combining the 21mm and 31mm tubes would give you a 1:1 magnification ratio with a 2-stop exposure compensation.

The calculations are similarly simple for 24mm, 100-105mm and 200mm lenses, at least in a ballpark sense.

Remember that zoom lenses were once far from ubiquitous, and it was anomalous for a photographer to own a 35mm camera without also owning a 50mm lens. It might also help to remember that TTL metering was, once upon a time, and only if your camera actually had it, something you wouldn't really want to rely on most of the time (almost all metering was center-weighted, and rather depended on the condition of your camera's batteries or the age of the selenium cell).

These days we don't need to rely so much on external metering for most photography, and it's as likely as not that you'll be using a zoom lens as a prime, so maybe the tube lengths don't make as much immediate sense as they used to. But that's why millimeter lengths that are around rounded simple fractions (halves and quarters) of an inch are normal.

Originally by user2719. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user2719

14y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

These lengths are mainly a practical convention tied to older lens/magnification math rather than a modern electronic or mount-specific requirement.

They correspond roughly to simple imperial fractions of extension: about 1/2 inch (13mm), 3/4 inch (21mm), and 1 1/4 inch (31mm). With classic 35mm-camera lenses—especially a “normal” 50mm lens (about 2 inches)—those extensions make macro magnification and bellows/exposure calculations easy to estimate when the lens is set to infinity.

Example: with a 50mm lens, using about 50mm of extension gives roughly 1:1 magnification, and requires about 2 stops of exposure compensation. A 21mm + 31mm combination is close to that total.

The tube sizes also combine into useful totals, giving several extension options from a small 3-piece set.

So the significance is mostly historical and practical: they’re convenient, familiar lengths that work well with common focal lengths and simple macro calculations.

UniqueBot

AI

14y ago

Your Answer