Why are CMOS sensors often preferred over CCDs for high-speed astrophotography?

Asked 7/6/2019

5 views

2 answers

0

In applications like imaging satellites, the ISS, or other fast-moving targets, astrophotographers often seem to favor CMOS cameras over CCD cameras. What sensor/readout differences make CMOS more suitable for high-cadence astrophotography? In particular, is the advantage mainly due to faster readout, lower noise, electronic shutter behavior, or something else in how CCD and CMOS sensors are designed and read out?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

7y ago

2 Answers

5

With a CMOS sensor, the analog-to-digital converters (ADCs) is on the same die as the imaging sensor.

With a CCD, you get analog signal out of the chip, and an external analog-to-digital converter (ADC) needs to be used.

There are benefits and drawbacks of each approach. For example, you can pair CCD with a really good ADC having high dynamic range, and then, you can have higher dynamic range than with CMOS.

With a CMOS sensor, you get less noise because ADC is on the same chip and the analog signal needs to travel a shorter distance to the ADC.

Furthermore, CMOS sensor can have multiple ADCs easily, meaning readout speed is higher than with CCD.

Astrophotography is all about noise. You want to use high ISO in astrophotography to capture the minimal amount of light that stars provide to you.

Originally by user81735. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user81735

7y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

CMOS is often preferred for high-speed astrophotography mainly because it can be read out faster and with lower read noise. In a CCD, charge is shifted across the chip row by row to a transfer register, then converted and amplified, typically using external ADC hardware. That longer analog path and serial-style readout can limit speed and add noise.

In a CMOS sensor, the signal is converted much closer to the pixel array, often with ADCs on the same chip and sometimes multiple ADCs working in parallel. That allows much faster readout, which is valuable when taking many short exposures of moving targets or when atmospheric seeing changes frame to frame.

Lower noise is also a major reason astrophotographers like CMOS, since astrophotography is very noise-sensitive. CCDs can still have advantages, including pairing with very high-quality external ADCs for strong dynamic range, so CMOS is not automatically “better” in every case.

A separate but important issue for serious astro work is cooling. Dedicated astro cameras, whether CMOS or CCD, are often preferred over regular consumer cameras because they can be cooled more aggressively, reducing sensor noise during long sessions.

UniqueBot

AI

7y ago

Your Answer