Why are broadcast and cinema cameras so much larger than DSLRs or mirrorless video cameras?
Asked 1/23/2017
5 views
2 answers
0
I’ve noticed that TV and studio video cameras are often much larger than DSLRs or mirrorless cameras like the Canon 70D or Panasonic GH4, even though those smaller cameras can shoot very good video. I understand why a DSLR is bigger than a phone or compact camera, but what makes professional broadcast or cinema cameras so large? Is it the camera body itself, the lenses, or extra equipment? What practical differences do those larger components make in real-world filming?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
9y ago
2 Answers
5
There are a few factors that contribute to this but Ill break it down for TV cameras since that is what the question seems to be about,
(source)
The Lens: In many cases the camera is not really that big as much as it may just have a huge lens on it. Next time you are at a sporting event, take a look at how far the cameras are from the actual field but can still grab a great shot.
View Finder: Studio cameras also tend to have large view finders (that are really more just small TV's) as apposed to the small eye piece finders or 3 inch screens found on your DSLR. Note the big unit on the upper rear of the camera in the image.
Extra Features: In a live TV studio that implements a multi-camera setup bused through a mixer of some sort will need some extra features to pull off a broadcast. When editing video you have the luxury of correcting things like color in post production. In a live setup you dont have this luxury so to avoid dropped frames which switching and to ensure the colors are constant across multiple cameras the cameras have things like Genock and remote color correction etc.
Teleprompters: some large units also have integrated teleprompters and queue lights which make them seem large but in reality what you are looking at is something else.
Old Gear: In some cases studios invest in high quality equipment and expect to get a lot of years out of it. In turn some gear is simply big and bulky as it dates to an era where that was the smallest stuff available.
Originally by user41399. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user41399
9y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
They’re often larger because the “camera system” includes more than just the imaging body.
A big part of the size is the lens. Broadcast cameras are commonly used far from the subject—such as at sports events—so they may carry very large zoom lenses.
Studio and TV cameras also often have much larger viewfinders/monitors than the small rear screen or eyepiece on a DSLR. Those larger displays help operators frame and monitor shots in professional environments.
Another reason is built-in broadcast features. In multi-camera live production, cameras may need connections and hardware to integrate with a mixer/switcher and the rest of the studio system. That adds bulk compared with a DSLR or mirrorless camera designed mainly as a self-contained stills camera with video features.
So the size difference is not just about image quality. Larger professional cameras are built to support long lenses, easier monitoring, and workflow features needed for live TV and studio production. Smaller cameras can produce excellent video, but they usually require compromises or external accessories when used in the same kinds of professional setups.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI9y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
What is a Canon DigiSuper lens, and why does it cost so much?
Why do full-frame camera bodies cost so much more than APS-C models?
Are smartphone camera lenses lower quality than DSLR or compact camera lenses, and why?
Why are digital medium format cameras often considered to have better image quality?
Why do most photo zoom lenses lose focus when zooming, while cinema/TV zooms stay in focus?