Why am I getting uneven development when tray-developing 4x5 black-and-white negatives?

Asked 1/15/2017

2 views

2 answers

0

I’m shooting 4x5 on a Graflex Speed Graphic and consistently getting uneven density, most visible in smooth skies, when I tray-develop sheet film. The negatives develop evenly in a tank using the same film, developer, and times, so the issue seems specific to tray processing.

Current tray process:

  • 5x7 plastic trays with channels
  • developer at 20°C
  • film placed emulsion side up
  • tray rocked about 10 times per minute during development
  • 1 minute stop bath with constant agitation
  • 4 minutes in fresh fixer, rocking 10 times per minute
  • wash, wetting agent, hang dry

I’ve seen the issue with Arista EDU 100 and Ilford Delta 100, using both Ilfosol 3 (1:9, 5 to 7.4 min) and D-76 1:1 (10 min), so it does not seem tied to one film or developer.

What tray-development mistakes are most likely to cause this kind of unevenness, and what should I change?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

9y ago

2 Answers

5

A lack of uniformity in a mundane expanse such as the sky likely traces back to the developing technique. The first thing I would do is re-fix these negatives in the hope that they were under-fixed. The rule of thumb is to immerse a small piece of undeveloped film in the fixer. This is performed in a lighted room. Time how long it takes for the fixer to clear the film, then double this for the appropriate fix time. Better too long than to short.

That being said, development is dependent on the developer, which is mainly water, infusing into the emulsion, so it can go to work. The emulsion binder is gelatin, a long chain polymer. It is chosen because it is transparent, flexible, and has low solubility. When first wet by the waters of the developer, it swells. This action opens up the structure allowing the developer goodies to enter and do their work.

If uniformity is the problem, likely the developing time is too short. My first advice is to select a developer formula that takes more time to work. How about ten minutes obtained by formula, dilution or temperature?

Next let’s talk about “bromine drag”. As the developer works, it reduces the silver salt crystal to its two component parts. The silver portion, now metallic silver, remains embedded in the gelatin; the halogen portion is dissolved and is flushed out by agitation. As the halogen exits, its presence retards development until completely flushed out because fresh developer can’t get in. If the film is in a stagnant fluid, halogens, heavier than the surrounds, flow downward by gravity. The dots on the edge printing will divulge this by showing a faint comma-like tail. Look for this as a sign of insufficient agitation.

Again, my advice is a longer developing time.

Originally by user44949. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user44949

9y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

The most likely cause is the tray technique, not the film or camera. Since the same negatives come out even in a tank, focus on development uniformity in the tray.

Most likely issues from the answers:

  • Developer may not be covering the sheet fully and instantly.
  • Development times may be too short, making immersion and transfer timing errors more visible.
  • Agitation may be uneven.
  • Fixing time may be insufficient; test fixer clearing time with a scrap of undeveloped film, then fix for about double that time.
  • Water quality may be affecting chemistry; try mixing solutions with purified water.

Practical changes:

  • Use enough developer to fully immerse the sheet at once.
  • Aim for longer development times (about 10 minutes minimum was suggested) by adjusting dilution if needed.
  • Agitate consistently and thoroughly.
  • Make sure the sheet is wetted evenly from the start.

In short: your problem is probably uneven initial wetting/coverage and short tray times, with fixing and water chemistry also worth checking.

UniqueBot

AI

9y ago

Your Answer