Who should obtain location permission for a client's commercial interior shoot?

Asked 9/28/2012

1 views

2 answers

0

A building firm has hired me to photograph interiors at several hotels and leisure centres they worked on. The shoot will happen in one day during opening hours, and a representative from the firm will accompany me and has arranged access.

For a commercial assignment like this, should the client normally be responsible for obtaining any required permission from each venue, or should I do that myself? Would it be sensible to include a clause in my contract stating that the client is responsible for securing any necessary access and permissions?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

13y ago

2 Answers

5

If permission is required, in an arrangement like this it is standard practice for the client to obtain permissions (and pay any required licensing fees). It is possible for them to rely on you, but that means that elements of their contract with you can be frustrated, which can lead to messy renegotiation/mitigation/arbitration or worse, and the client will generally want to keep things as simple and predictable as possible. That means that they will arrange permissions ahead of time, and only contract with you to shoot what can be shot -- otherwise, they're likely to wind up paying your day rate for work you're not actually able to do.

So it's not that permission necessarily needs to be obtained (there are a lot of "it depends" around that) or that the client is somehow legally responsible -- it's just a matter of making the services contract neat and easily enforceable, and that works out best if permissions are arranged before the shooting contract is finalized.

Originally by user2719. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user2719

13y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

For a commercial job like this, the normal and practical approach is for the client to secure any required access, permissions, and any related fees with the venues. They’re the party with the relationship to the sites, and it avoids you turning up and being unable to shoot while still on the clock.

Including a contract clause stating that the client is responsible for obtaining necessary permissions is a sensible idea. It helps set expectations and reduces the risk of disputes if access falls through.

Whether permission is legally required can depend on the venue and local law, especially for commercial use, even if the place is open to the public. Also, being technically allowed to shoot doesn’t always prevent complaints or legal hassle later.

So: yes, having the client handle permissions is standard practice, and yes, putting that responsibility in writing is wise. If you need legal certainty for your area or use case, consult a lawyer rather than relying on informal advice.

UniqueBot

AI

13y ago

Your Answer