Which is better for portraits on a Canon Rebel T3: 50mm f/1.8 or 55-200mm f/4.5-5.6?
Asked 12/12/2011
3 views
2 answers
0
I bought a Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II for my Canon Rebel T3 because it was recommended for portraits, and I’ve liked the results so far. I’m now wondering whether a Canon EF 55-200mm f/4.5-5.6 would give similarly good portrait results while also adding zoom flexibility.
I’m especially confused about what the aperture numbers mean: f/1.8 versus f/4.5-5.6. For portrait photography, which lens is the better choice, and what are the tradeoffs?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
14y ago
2 Answers
10
The "f/1.8" vs "f/4.5-5.6" part is key as it denotes how wide open the aperture will go on each lens. The 50mm lens, with a maximum aperture of f/1.8, will allow you to shoot in much lower light conditions or with much faster shutter speeds than the zoom lens, which is designated "f/4.5-5.6" to let you know that the maximum (widest) aperture is f/4.5 at the 55mm end and f/5.6 at the 200mm end.
To compare the 55mm end of the zoom lens with the 50mm lens, if you took a photograph at 1/125s at f/1.8 with the 50mm lens you'd need to use a shutter speed of 1/15s or slower with the zoom lens in identical lighting conditions (or change the camera's ISO setting by three stops to compensate), as it will not open wider than f/4.5. This makes the lens much less versatile as far as lighting is concerned. Additionally, using the f/1.8 aperture on the 50mm lens will result in a much shallower depth of field, something that is often highly desirable in portrait photography.
The 200mm zoom range would not be much use for formal portraits either, as your subject would usually be close enough to allow you to shoot at 55mm.
My advice would be to buy the 50mm lens if its primary use is for portraiture. The zoom lens sacrifices a lot for that zoom range and should only be used if you need the full range of the zoom and you have a restricted budget.
Originally by user456. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user456
14y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
For portraits, the 50mm f/1.8 is usually the better choice if your goal is flattering subject separation and shooting in lower light.
The aperture numbers matter a lot: a smaller f-number means a wider maximum aperture. So f/1.8 lets in much more light than f/4.5-5.6, which means:
- faster shutter speeds in the same light
- better low-light performance
- shallower depth of field for blurrier backgrounds
That background blur is one reason the 50mm portraits often look better than kit-zoom shots.
The 55-200mm does give you the convenience of zoom, and longer focal lengths can be flattering for portraits. But it’s much slower, so it won’t blur the background as easily and will need more light or higher ISO. At 55mm it’s already far dimmer than the 50mm f/1.8, and at 200mm it’s dimmer still.
So:
- choose the 50mm f/1.8 for stronger portrait look and low-light use
- choose the 55-200mm if you need flexible framing and more reach
If portraits are the main purpose, keep using the 50mm. The zoom is more about convenience than matching the same portrait style.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI14y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Which lens is better on a Canon Rebel T5i for makeup videos and portraits: 50mm f/1.8 or 55-200mm f/4.5-5.6?
Which is better on a Canon T3: EF 75-300mm or EF-S 55-250mm for street and nature?
Which Nikon D5000 lens is better for portraits and more reach: 60mm macro, 50mm prime, or 70-300mm zoom?
Best Canon lens for portraits and occasional wedding/party shooting on an EOS 600D?
Is the Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II a good portrait lens for a Canon Rebel T1i?