Which interchangeable-lens camera offers strong remote control and manual controls for timelapse or astrophotography?
Asked 10/19/2011
2 views
2 answers
0
I'm looking for a system camera for experimental setups such as timelapse and astrophotography. My ideal camera would offer flexible remote control from a computer or programmable trigger, preferably with live view plus control over shutter, focus, aperture, ISO, and shutter speed. An external monitor output and hands-off control would also be useful.
Other priorities are good manual handling, ideally with separate control dials for aperture and shutter speed, low sensor noise, and overall good usability. Webcam-style video output would be a bonus.
I originally considered Micro Four Thirds or Four Thirds, but I'm open to other systems if they better meet these needs. I may also want to adapt M42/telescope-mounted optics, so broad adapter support matters.
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
14y ago
2 Answers
2
I would take a look at the Canon 60D. It is not a micro four thirds camera, it is an APS-C sensor sized camera. The reasons I suggest this include:
- Larger sensors as opposed to the micro four thirds format should provide lower noise typically
- The 60D has great manual controls, including an index finger wheel near the shutter release and a full size wheel on the back
- Available remote control software(example1,2)
- Not an extremely large body
It does not sound like you have a hard requirement for micro four thirds, only for cost, remote control software, noise performance, and usability. I think you will find all of this and more in the canon 60D for right around $750. The 50D would also be an option to save a bit of money.
Originally by user4892. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user4892
14y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
Based on the answers, the Canon 60D is a strong fit for your requirements, even though it is APS-C rather than Micro Four Thirds.
Why it matches well:
- APS-C sensor: generally offers lower noise than Micro Four Thirds, which is helpful for astrophotography.
- Manual controls: it has two strong physical control points, including a front dial near the shutter and a large rear control wheel, making manual exposure adjustments easier.
- Remote control: community answers specifically mention available remote-control software with live-view-style operation and camera control.
- Size/usability: it was noted as not being an extremely large body while still offering good handling.
If you want a lower-cost alternative, the Canon 50D was also suggested.
For telescope or M42 use, adapters are commonly available in general, so this is usually feasible, though you should always verify the exact mount adapter you need for your lens or telescope setup.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI14y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Is manual mode really better than automatic, and when should I use each?
Which DSLRs under $1000 have separate controls for aperture and shutter speed?
Which camera first used modern control wheels for exposure settings?
Which lens mounts retain the most functionality when adapted to Micro Four Thirds?
Why do Panasonic Lumix cameras use the Micro Four Thirds system?