Which Cokin filter system works with a Canon 6D and lenses from 17-40mm to 100-400mm?
Asked 10/5/2016
4 views
2 answers
0
I’m starting to use filters for landscape photography and want an affordable Cokin system for a Canon 6D. My lenses are EF 17-40mm f/4L, EF 100-400mm, EF 50mm f/1.4, and 100mm macro. I’m unsure whether the Cokin P or Z-Pro system is the better fit across this range, especially for the 17-40mm on a full-frame body. Which holder size should I choose, and are there any vignetting issues to be aware of?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
9y ago
2 Answers
1
On all of the lenses you list but the EF 17-40mm f/4 L you could get by with the Cokin P series which uses 84mm filters. For wide angle lenses with 72mm filter threads Cokin recommends using the Cokin Z-Pro Series which uses 100mm filters.
Based on several online reports, including this thread, from those who have tried the standard P series holder with the EF 17-40mm f/4 L you'll get vignetting at focal lengths shorter than about 20mm with a FF camera. The Cokin "wide angle" holder that is thinner and only holds a single filter does a bit better but still vignettes slightly at 17mm. Since the filter holder is thicker on the sides than on the top and bottom, turning the filter holder 90° will reduce the vignetting, but that limits your ability to use rectangular graduated ND filters.
Keep in mind that the EF 17-40mm f/4 has fairly significant light loss in the corners at 17mm and f/4 even when there is absolutely nothing attached to the front of it. How much more you're willing to tolerate caused by the filter holder could also factor into your decision.
Originally by user15871. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user15871
9y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
For most of your lenses, the Cokin P series (84mm) should work. The main issue is the EF 17-40mm f/4L on your full-frame 6D: the standard P holder is reported to vignette below about 20mm. The thinner Cokin wide-angle holder improves things, but may still show slight vignetting at 17mm.
If you want the system to work properly with the 17-40mm at its widest settings, the safer choice is the Cokin Z-Pro series (100mm), which is better suited to wide-angle use on full frame.
So in practice:
- Budget-first: Cokin P series for the other lenses, accepting limitations on the 17-40mm.
- Best all-around fit: Cokin Z-Pro if you want to use filters on the 17-40mm at 17mm with fewer vignetting problems.
One workaround with the P holder is rotating it 90° to reduce corner vignetting, but that limits use of graduated ND filters, which is often the whole point for landscapes.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI9y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Can I mount a circular polarizer behind a 100mm slot-in filter holder?
When should you use a rear gelatin filter instead of a front screw-in filter?
Why does Lightroom use a camera-specific lens profile for my Canon EF 17-40mm f/4L?
Which Canon lens setup makes more sense for landscape photography on a 500D?
Can you use a screw-on variable ND filter with a Cokin Z square filter holder?